Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Writing skills of academic papers in ancient literature
Writing skills of academic papers in ancient literature
Writing skills of academic papers in ancient literature

China has a long history. In the historical development of more than 2,000 years, there are numerous masterpieces and schools. Undoubtedly, such a huge historical document system provides enough space for the writing of academic papers on ancient literature. Of course, many things are two-sided, and more choices mean bad choices. For example, how to write an academic paper on ancient literature at the moment? Let me introduce you.

Writing of academic papers on ancient literature

1, topic selection

Be accurate when choosing a topic. The so-called accuracy means that the size of the topic should be suitable for our research, especially the scope of the topic should not be too wide. The scope of the topic is too wide, which will cause us to be unable to engage in research because of the limitation of energy and ability, and have no time to take care of all aspects of research, resulting in a situation of paying attention to one thing and losing another.

To be precise when choosing a topic, we also need to choose a topic with moderate depth, which is unrealistic and too deep. For the author of undergraduate academic papers, the research results will have a sense of party, which will lead to insufficient weight of the articles and suspicion of underestimating the enemy.

Step 2: Ideas

We all know that academic papers should be written with clear ideas and clear logic. The problem is how to sort out the train of thought. If you want to be clear-headed, you need to read a lot of academic papers to see how others' papers are conceived and discussed, how to standardize your own central arguments and arguments, how to focus on the center without deviating from the center, and how to end the ending.

As far as the papers studied by writers are concerned, the usual ideas are: (1) clarifying and explaining the writer's life, generally explaining the writer's literary achievements, (2) revealing the writer's ideological expression, and whether his political views, cultural views, outlook on life and philosophical thoughts are systematic; (3) What is written in the writer's main literary works and what thoughts are reflected; (4) What are the characteristics and successes of the writer's literary works? (5) What is the writer's literary influence?

As far as works research papers are concerned, the usual ideas are: (1) poetry, music and fu. The ideas of this kind of paper are as follows: ① Briefly introduce the author and the content of the work; ② Analysis of the political spirit (ideological content) of the works; ④ What is the artistic quality of the work (style, artistic conception, language features, aesthetic spirit, etc.). ); 4 summary. (2) novels and operas. The ideas of this kind of paper are as follows: ① Briefly introduce the author and the content of the work; ② Analysis of the main spirit of the work; (3) Introduction to the artistic achievements of the works (characterization, language style, structural arrangement and conflict, status in literary history and literary influence); 4 summary.

3. Structure

As far as academic papers are concerned, the structural requirements are not complicated. In other words, the structure of the paper is only increased compared with the length of the general paper. Nevertheless, we should pay attention to the structure of academic papers.

In the history of ancient literature? Tongcheng school? The requirements of ancient prose writers for the structure of articles set a good example for us to write papers today. When writing a paper, we might as well take their theory and practice as a reference for structural arrangement.

It's important to make a good start. When writing a thesis, hoop writers often worry about whether there is a good beginning, but stop there. A good opening is rare. The opening directly affects the fluency of the following articles.

After the opening, how to continue writing should be considered. Cheng? problem ? Cheng? In other words, we should follow the idea put forward at the beginning of the article and not deviate from it. We should decompose the ideas put forward at the beginning into the following articles and demonstrate or explain them one by one.

Turn? Turn? , are you there? Cheng? Continue to play on the basis of, but from a different angle. What if? Cheng? Part of this book is about positive theory, and then what? Turn? In order to achieve the purpose of comprehensive argumentation and convincing results, the part of the paper is anti-writing or anti-theory (edge theory)

That is to say, we usually say that the ending length should not be too long. As long as we reconfirm the views discussed in the article, we can also explain its status or influence as a supplementary explanation to end the whole article.

;