Eight-part essay originated in the Northern Song Dynasty. Wang Anshi's reform thought that it was unrealistic to choose scholars by poetry and fu in Tang Dynasty. Therefore, many subjects are scholars, and they are all classics. There is no need to ask for confrontation because the style is not standardized. However, some candidates unconsciously use parallelism to write articles similar to eight-part essays. The imperial examinations in the Yuan Dynasty basically followed the Song Dynasty. The imperial examination was held in the first year of Hongwu in Ming Dynasty (1368), which had clear requirements on system and style. During the Chenghua period, under the advocacy of Wang Yong, Xie Qian, Zhang Mao and others, the eight-part essay became more prosperous and gradually formed a strict program. Since then, it has been used until the Reform Movement of 1898, and it was abolished with the cessation of the imperial examination.
The basic characteristics of stereotyped writing are as follows: 1. The titles are all the original texts in the Five Classics and Four Books. 2. The content must be based on the comments of Zhu Cheng School. 3. Genre structure has a fixed format. The full text consists of topic, topic, speech, topic, stock, stock, stock and knot.
The number of words in stereotyped writing is also limited. The system in the early Ming dynasty: after the township examination, the exam was held, and the meaning of the five classics was 500 words. "Four Books" has the meaning of 300 words. In the Qing dynasty, Kangxi required 550 words, and after Qianlong, 700 words shall prevail. Writing is also formatted.
During the Ming and Qing Dynasties, stereotyped writing was a compulsory course for almost all official and private schools. It should be used from children's examination to provincial examination and examination. If you can't write eight-part essay, you can't pass the imperial examination, and it's hard to be an official. Stereotyped writing has no practical value because its sole purpose is to cope with the imperial examination. During the Ming and Qing Dynasties, many people of insight hated stereotyped writing. Finally, it was abandoned, which should be said to be a historical necessity.
Fan Wen:
Which is better, a woman or a woman?
The more you ask a saint, the more you should introspect.
Don't you know that Fu Zigong and Yan Yuan are more important than others? Is it a tribute to the son of the problem, not a reflection?
If we say that women are usually good at Renye Fang, I think women are wise. There is a metaphor that the husband is in others, so he has no measure in himself. A knowledgeable person will not be ignorant of his bosom friend, but will be willing to help someone.
Don't husband and daughter stand side by side with Hui?
The benefits of virtue, return to the first, then there must be a reason to return, and then there will be no shame.
The beauty of words, women also have expertise. Then a woman must be a woman, and then she can be a political choice.
However, in the back, in the humble alley, the real happiness of poverty must be balanced with women.
That is, the stepmother, please go and make up a contemporary celebrity. It is necessary to compare it with Hui.
And I can't forget women, and I can't forget the return of women.
Today, people born in heaven are very smart and talented. Although the creation is not aware of its unevenness, it will become more and more complicated. That makes sense.
Your wife's accomplishments are also shallow and profound. Although teachers can't get a glimpse of its weight, they don't know which is more and which is more. Love also.
Will you say that you have recovered more than women? And since the woman has always had doubts, she is also a family.
Will it be said that there are more women than returning? And since March, it has been called our party.
Will it be said that the woman will not heal herself, and the woman will not heal herself? This can be compared with a teacher who is not as good as a teacher, and the return of a strong woman in business is not a case.
Will it be said that sometimes the more women reply, the more women reply? This can be compared with the truth of retiring as a human being. Asking for a woman and returning are different.
It's hard to deceive my husband's disciples, and I'm not dissatisfied with my opinion. There is nothing wrong with women. However, what I said is not as good as a woman's decision. Which is higher, Xifu is the old man's own account.
The cultivation of a husband's room is clear to the bystander, and he knows the merits and demerits, and he knows the shortcomings of women. However, it is better for women to break it than for people to talk about it. Which is light, which is mysterious, Xifu is white to colleagues.
I can't forget women, nor can I forget women's love and return. Which is better, the woman or the back?
/199803/29.htm About stereotyped writing