Question 2: What is "argument validity analysis"? Argument validity analysis is to analyze and comment on the acceptability of the topics in the arguments provided. The validity analysis of argumentative writing is a writing test based on "argument analysis" and one of the GMAT composition questions. The conclusion of empirical validity analysis can be positive or qualitative. Affirmation means that the arguments provided are completely convincing and acceptable, and then positive analysis and comments are made on them. The conclusion of affirmative analysis can be divided into absolute certainty and relative certainty. Absolute affirmation is to affirm all the components that make up the argument; Relative affirmation means affirming the provided arguments in principle or generality, but denying, questioning or perfecting the unreasonable or unconvincing parts. Negation means that the argument provided is not convincing and acceptable enough, and then it is negatively analyzed and commented. The conclusion of negative analysis can be divided into absolute negation and relative negation. Absolute negation means denying all the parts that make up the argument; Relative negation is a principled or general negation of the arguments provided, while affirming the reasonable or convincing parts.
The analysis of argument validity is a flawed argument, which needs candidates to analyze and comment. The content of analysis and comment is decided by the examinee according to the test questions.
The analysis of the validity of argument is to find out the defects of this argument, and argument is the process or language form of supporting or refuting a certain point of view with some reason. Since we have to analyze and comment on this argument, how can we analyze and comment? Generally speaking, the validity of this argument should be analyzed mainly from the aspects of concept, method, process and conclusion. The analysis of the validity of argumentation requires us to write critical articles, but it should be noted that this is still different from the general critical articles, and the scope of analysis and comment is clearly defined and stipulated, which is conditional.
When analyzing the validity of the argument, we should pay attention to the following points:
(1) Find the most important logical problem in stem argument (there may be several general logical problems).
(2) Briefly and pertinently explain why these problems become problems (don't make a long speech).
(3) only judge the form, not the content, and never state your own views or show your attitude.
(4) It is different from post-reading feeling and argumentative writing.
Question 3: What are the arguments, arguments and arguments of argumentative writing? 1: The argument must be based, that is, sufficient facts or correct reasons must be cited to prove the correctness of the argument. The facts and reasons used to prove an argument are called arguments.
Argumentation is the process of "what to prove", "what to prove" and "how to prove". In argumentative writing, we should discuss two issues, the structure and the method of argumentative writing.
Question 4: What is a feasibility study? 15 is divided into feasibility demonstration and infeasibility demonstration.
Feasibility demonstration refers to the organization's political, economic and cultural demonstration of the work to be done, confirming that it is "politically qualified, economically effective and culturally correct" and can be implemented.
Feasibility demonstration refers to the demonstration that the work to be done by an organization may not meet the political, economic and cultural requirements, saying that it is unprepared.
By 2005, the central government's application was mainly for feasibility study. Since then, it has mainly focused on the feasibility study.
Question 5: What does the feasibility study mean? It refers to the working method of comprehensively analyzing and demonstrating the technical advancement and economic rationality of the project in order to achieve the best economic effect. Generally, it is divided into three stages: opportunity study, preliminary feasibility study and technical and economic feasibility study. The key problem of modern feasibility demonstration often lies in the correct analysis and evaluation of the maturity of technology, economic rationality, the scope and conditions of technology application and the expected economic and social benefits.
Question 6: Correct mistakes: All major decisions must be scientifically demonstrated, and opinions from all sides should be widely listened to to to ensure the correctness of the decisions. All major decisions should be widely listened to and scientifically demonstrated to ensure the correctness of the decisions.
Question 7: What do you mean by refuting the argument? Republic argument is a kind of argument method to refute the enemy's argument, prove its error and absurdity, and thus prove its own point of view is correct. Refutation can be divided into three types: refutation point, refutation basis and refutation argument. The commonly used refutation methods include direct refutation and reduction to absurdity.
(1) Direct rebuttal is a way to directly prove the enemy's argument wrong by argument or reasoning.
(2) disproof, in order to prove that the other side's argument is wrong, you can first prove that another argument that contradicts it is correct. This is called reduction to absurdity. For example, Lu Xun's article "Have China People Lost Confidence? In order to refute the wrong argument that "China people have lost confidence", he put forward the positive argument that "do we have China people who have lost confidence", and then proved the correctness of this argument with facts from ancient times to modern times, thus refuting the opposite argument.
(3) reduction to absurdity, first assume that the other party's argument is right, and then on its premise, deduce an obviously absurd conclusion, thus proving that the other party's argument is wrong. For example:
Question 8: What do valid arguments, invalid arguments, perfect arguments and incomplete arguments mean? What do you mean complete? 15 points for effective discussion, and everyone admits that it can be put into practice. Invalid discussion, completely recognized by everyone, incomplete, complete consciousness is the perfect past of things, without any unexpected events.