1. First, blind trial is not difficult and easy to pass. However, it didn't pass 100%. We must pay attention to this. Although blind review is not difficult, the papers in the same batch will basically not pass. How much will be killed depends on our own policy. I know something about sights. In any case, the theory of blind trial failed 100%. When I write a master's degree, I must explain this to the students before. There is no such thing as a blind test. If someone tells you that, it must be a liar or a pit. 2. Second, what does the blind trial mainly look at? From my experience, there is no absolute, often metaphysics, but at least I can sum up some regular experience. For example, we will pay attention to the framework logic of the paper, the writing situation (whether it conforms to academic language norms, not vernacular), the research content and achievements of the paper, and some corresponding key logic points, which are often the key points that will determine whether a paper passes or not. If a paper is killed, it is likely to have serious injuries in these aspects. Other minor issues are not important. For example, the so-called research and innovation, layout, some typos and so on. None of this matters. If someone tells you this is important, it's pure nonsense, even if your tutor says so, it's also nonsense. Even if your paper is killed, it is not for these reasons. There must be other serious injuries. Don't talk about the format, even the abstract is written in a variety of ways, and there is no better way to say it. There are many common two-paragraph, three-paragraph, total score and four-point fixed medical papers. Is there anything wrong with the writing of these abstracts? No problem at all. Many people read too few papers and have never seen how to write them, so they take it for granted that what is good and what is not good is actually nonsense. Similarly, there are writing methods of literature review, which is better, the dichotomy of research status or the argument writing method of literature review? Either way, there is no difference between good and bad. I have written a lot, read a lot, and basically read all kinds of forms. Can I say that there is something wrong with what others wrote? Actually, there is no problem. Many times, it's just the arrogance of some people. They think they are knowledgeable, but in fact they have too little knowledge. Many tutors have this problem.