1. Theme and structure of the paper: In the introduction, the author usually puts forward a research question or hypothesis and discusses it. It can evaluate whether the questions or assumptions put forward by the author are reasonable and interesting, and whether the structure of the paper is clear and rigorous.

2. Research methods and data: Musicology papers usually adopt certain research methods and data analysis techniques. We can pay attention to the rationality and feasibility of the methods and techniques adopted by the author.

3. Research results and conclusions: The research results and conclusions of this paper are one of the key contents. You can evaluate whether the author's conclusion is reasonable, convincing and contribution to the field of musicology. At the same time, you can also discuss the potential impact and practical significance of these conclusions.

4. Interdisciplinary: Musicological papers often involve the knowledge and theories of other disciplines, such as psychology, sociology and history. We can evaluate the rationality and effectiveness of the author's application to other disciplines in the paper and explore the value of these interdisciplinary elements to the whole paper.

5. Personal feelings and thoughts: After reading the paper, you can share your feelings and thoughts. For example, you have aroused or inspired some opinions in this paper, or you have different views on some contents in the paper. At the same time, you can also compare and link the viewpoints in the paper with your own actual experience.

Matters needing attention in writing after reading:

1. Respect the original text and express your own views and feelings: When writing your review, you should first respect the views and contents of the original text and understand the author's thoughts and intentions. At the same time, we should also express our views and feelings and evaluate and discuss the original text. This kind of evaluation and discussion can focus on the overall structure of the article, the author's argumentation method, some specific views or the understanding of a sentence. In short, we should express our views and ideas on the basis of respecting the original text.

2, grasp the theme, the discussion should be concentrated: the writing of the post-reading feeling should be carried out around the theme, and do not deviate from the theme. In the discussion, we should make in-depth analysis and discussion around the aspects or viewpoints we are interested in. Don't finish reading a running account without focus.

3. Have critical thinking: When writing your post-reading, you should have critical thinking and analyze and evaluate the original point of view. You can question and refute the author's point of view, or put forward your own new point of view. At the same time, we should pay attention to using convincing materials such as facts and data to support our own views and improve the credibility of the argument.

4. Accurately quote the literature: When writing your post-reading, if you need to quote the literature to support your point of view, you must accurately mark the citation source. This is not only the respect for the author, but also the performance of being responsible for his own argument. At the same time, when quoting documents, we should be careful not to take them out of context or tamper with the original intention.