Give high praise, which includes both the writing skills of his works.
Joe also fully affirmed the ideological significance of his works. writing
Technically, O'Henry's ending is called "the author's performance is unique"
One of the artistic contents of social life "[1]. In the ideological sense, it
His works are known as "deep gaze, excavation and anatomy of social reality"
Analyze, criticize and even protest, inspire people's spirit and change social ills.
State, praise healthy human nature. "
O Henry received too much praise in China,
So that when people read his works, they always accept them all without doubt.
A little doubt is disrespectful to the host. However, reread it.
The last ivy leaf was re-examined by a new concept.
We don't understand the writing skills and ideological significance shown in his works.
Can we not doubt whether O 'Henry's works are really recognized as traditional views?
So perfect and noble
A writer is not only an objective recorder, but also a person.
The mission of soul exploration and moral correction. O'Henry tried to find his own.
The work undertakes this mission and expresses it through a shocking ending.
Praise the lofty human morality. However, this given order
The lofty ending that people appreciate also shows his admiration for things in his works.
The praise of the characters, which also exposed him very clearly.
This is the only way for some characters to appreciate the petty bourgeoisie.
Enough to see its low-level aesthetic taste, and this
Reality also clearly shows one's ideological realm. Such a person
This ideological realm of aesthetic taste should bear the traditional "it is based on mediocrity"
Deny vulgar, shallow, abnormal and morbid life phenomena and arouse humanistic essence.
God's sublimation to praise the greatness and sublimity "[1] is so high.
Evaluation should be said to be incompetent. Actually, it just happened to be with the biography.
On the contrary, from the discussion in this article, we can clearly see that Europe
Henry delights in the phenomenon of petty-bourgeois life, which is vulgar, shallow, abnormal and morbid.
Reward and affirmation. If he uses his O'Henry ending to achieve his goal,
The purpose of "praising healthy humanity", then his morbid petty-bourgeois mood.
In any case, appreciation is not a measure to "change social pathology".
From this point of view, his appreciation of petty bourgeoisie sentiment in his works shows that
Unhealthy aesthetic orientation cannot be said to be not the work of O 'Henry.
A major flaw in ideology makes his works thought-provoking.
Want a deep discount [7].
In addition, his works are also flawed in writing skills.
It affected the realization of artistic appeal of his works, which was his accident.
The outcome often depends on some contingency.
Mailbox?