Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Evaluation of scientific research level is not only papers and awards, but also how to evaluate it?
Evaluation of scientific research level is not only papers and awards, but also how to evaluate it?
Besides the number of papers, academic works? ,? Transformation of scientific research achievements? It has become a standard for evaluating the level of scientific research. Some officials of the Ministry of Education mentioned that the key to adjusting the subject evaluation this time is to get rid of the disadvantages of evaluating academic level by professor title, professor degree and professor title, break the previous evaluation standard of only looking at the number of papers and add more images. Academic works? ,? Transformation of technological achievements? And establish a more multidimensional and pluralistic evaluation standard for scientific research level. At the same time, the assessment scope combines domestic academic journals with overseas academic journals, encourages the development of domestic academic journals, and takes academic achievements rather than the number of papers as the assessment standard, which is the biggest change of this new regulation.

This new regulation will also encourage the rapid and efficient circulation of high-end talents and avoid excessive brain drain in the central and western regions. On the one hand, the key professors and researchers in various disciplines are constantly selected, and the number of key professors is no longer set, focusing on both quality and quantity. On the other hand, clarifying the division of property rights of scientific research results not only ensures that researchers have good enthusiasm, but also ensures that scientific research results will not be used excessively and become a means for some researchers to collect money.

We also attach importance to the cultivation of scientific research talent echelon, not only encourage scientific research professors to make breakthroughs in technology, but also include teaching quality and class hours in the assessment criteria, so that more students can accept the guidance of professional professors and avoid the emergence of talent echelon due to excessive adherence to scientific research. At the same time, increase the teaching time and salary of key professors, so that professors are more willing to participate in teaching work.

For colleges and universities, the regulations also require the establishment of a unified data accounting standard to prevent researchers from being delayed by too many data reports and approvals, improve the quantitative ability of scientific research technology, and carry out better and fairer incentive and subsidy policies through big data. At the same time, scientific research institutions should reduce activities unrelated to teaching and research to avoid affecting the normal operation of schools.