Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Why do people with good nature do some evil things?
Why do people with good nature do some evil things?
Why do people with good nature do evil things when they have to? No one is completely pure. People always have selfish desires, so this is not unusual.

Why does an evil person feel very moved when he sees a kind person? That's because his conscience was awakened.

Excuse me, kind people, how do you treat evil? The evil party will take the lead in creating public opinion and attack each other first, while the kind people are always in no hurry to explain, alienate them and ignore them until time gives them a real answer.

Are there many good people or bad people? Ask God for help. Personally, there is no real goodness and evil in this world, and good people will do despicable and evil things. Evil people will also do things that are beneficial to others. For example, kindness is a high realm, and evil is also a high realm. When evil people are evil people, of course, they also exude a charm when they have not done anything good, but I am not hypocritical. This is of course a very high realm. There are no such people in this world, just like real and kind people.

What is the relationship between ambition and good and evil? Good people are called ambitions, and bad people are called ambitions, right? Relationship is human heart.

A Kind Fox and a Evil Wolf Fairy Tale Once upon a time, there lived a group of foxes in a big forest. They often foraged around in droves. One day, they went out to look for food as usual and suddenly found a camel's body on the ground. The foxes were so happy that they all wanted to pounce on it and eat their fill alone, so they were wary of each other for fear that other foxes would beat them to it. I have suffered losses myself. At this moment, an old fox said to everyone:

"This is a godsend delicious. With so much camel meat, we don't have to worry about not finding meat for many days! However, if we fight each other for camel meat. To outdo each other, the strong will eat to death and the weak will starve to death. In order to avoid this kind of tragedy and deal with the relationship between the strong and the weak in time, we should find a fair person and let him distribute food to us, so as to ensure that each of our companions has the necessary food and avoid bullying the weak. Of course, in return, the person responsible for distributing food can also get a piece of camel meat. "

This suggestion was immediately agreed by all foxes. However, who should be found to act as this just person? Just as the fox was worried, a wolf appeared in front of them. So a fox said to his companion:

"You see, if you want to find an arbitrator, I think this wolf is quite suitable. Because as far as I know, it has the blood of a king and is brave and strong. Let it take the job. "

The foxes thought it was right, so they came forward and said to the wolf:

"We ask you to be an arbitrator. Your responsibility is to evenly distribute the camel meat we need to each of our foxes every day, so as not to compete with each other. The strong bully the weak and kill each other internally. "

The wolf had a brainwave and agreed at once. On the same day, it dutifully distributed camel meat to foxes, and each fox got a delicious camel meat. Everyone thinks that the wolf shared it fairly and reasonably. The wolf ate the same share and should be satisfied. However, the wolf is ambitious, and the next day, the wolf's heart is broken. It thinks: This camel is very big. If I give so much meat to these incompetent people every day, I can only eat an equal share at most. I am a wolf, much better than them. If I enjoy this camel alone, I can't help them. Who let them be born to be our wolf's food? In that case, this camel should belong to me alone, and they can't stop me! Maybe this is what the wise Allah arranged for me! I'm going to put them aside and enjoy the food alone. From now on, I won't give them anything.

The next morning, the fox came to the wolf for food again. Unexpectedly, the wolf changed his face and flatly refused their request on the pretext that food was not enough. The fox glared at the wolf. Grinding on the ear, knowing that it is very strong, had to submit to humiliation and leave. The foxes dare not say anything in front of the wolf, so they have to say behind their backs:

"It seems that this is the arrangement of Allah, so we must resign! Because none of us can compete with it. "

"Maybe the Wolf has a big appetite. It treats us like this because of hunger. It is better to let him have a good meal today so that he can redistribute food for us tomorrow.

Which stars are really good people with good nature? First of all, we should look at what is the measure of the so-called "really good people have good nature". You know, there are so many people, things and things in the world that there are no absolute rules. They are not only right and wrong, but also good and bad. They may be good in some aspects and completely opposite in others. Therefore, before evaluating and drawing conclusions, we must first choose the standards and scales for measuring and judging. Personal opinion, don't spray if you don't like it!

White is more evil than black, which means that more evil species have white hair, while kind people have black hair. The bright sunshine in the dark shines on you and me.

The sun shines on the good and the bad. How to write an argumentative essay can be divided into two categories if it is analyzed from the logical relationship of the content of the article:

vertical

Discuss the structure layer by layer.

Example 1. In the "step-by-step" style, first put forward the argument, then demonstrate it step by step, gradually expand the truth, and finally summarize it.

Example 2. "Positive and negative argument" type: first put forward the argument, then demonstrate it from the negative side, and then further discuss it from the positive side.

horizontal

Discussion structure of parallel expansion

For example:

There is a kind of "general-sub-theory-general" style, which first puts forward the argument, then expounds it from several aspects and finally summarizes it;

There is a style of "general theory-divided theory", which first puts forward arguments and then demonstrates them from several aspects.

There is a style of "divided theory-general theory". The things to be discussed are always analyzed in several aspects, and then a comprehensive conclusion is drawn.

In a word, to analyze the structure of an argumentative essay, we should first understand the internal relationship between paragraph levels, and also pay attention to the transitional paragraphs, transitional sentences and transitional words that serve as a link between the preceding and the following.

Are people more kind or evil? For example, thank you can be divided into two situations: one is that when it comes to self-interest, it is much more evil at this time; One is that it has nothing to do with yourself. From the perspective of judgment, it is much kinder at this time.