I still remember 10 years ago, university teachers organized the whole class to go to a museum in Shanghai to see an exhibition. The collection in the museum is wonderful, and everyone raises their cameras to choose angles and take pictures of details. At this time, several security guards came over.

My classmates and I put away the camera in some confusion. I didn't expect the security guard to smile at us and erect a finger: "That looks good, you go and shoot!" At that moment, I really felt a little flattered.

10

A few years later, when mobile phones gradually replaced cameras, people gradually developed the habit of visiting museums, and whether to take pictures in museums became a hot topic of social discussion. Recently, the National Gallery of Britain broke the ban for many years.

Order, began to allow the audience to take pictures at the venue. Sarah Crompton, editor-in-chief of the art section of the Daily Telegraph, wrote an article criticizing the museum's policies. "The policy of allowing the exhibition hall to take photos caters to this craze.

Passing by in a hurry betrayed all the audience who were eager to stare and meditate. "

People have different opinions on whether to take pictures in the museum. Some viewers think that when the sound is turned off.

On the premise of flashing lights, museums, as public spaces, should of course be allowed to take pictures. Some people think that even if the flash is turned off, taking pictures will still damage cultural relics and bring inconvenience to other viewers. On the museum's website,

You can put some high-definition pictures for people in need to download. However, due to various reasons, the accuracy of online pictures is often poor, and the exhibition album is expensive. For those who need textual research, they may be more willing to pass the self-study exam.

Your own camera to record.

In fact, today, most museums have allowed taking photos. Whether to take photos is not just a policy issue, but a personal choice. If we were in a museum,

After observing for a period of time, it is not difficult to find that there are three audiences. One is to take a quick look at the flowers, come and go in a hurry, take a picture in front of the "treasure of the town hall", and then take a selfie with yourself and cultural relics and send it to a circle of friends. "here!

A tour "; Second, with a specific research purpose, select multiple angles for a work, take a panoramic picture of the details, and take them home to appreciate them carefully; Third, simply don't take the camera, stop and linger, or watch it quietly or have a heated discussion, and return home satisfied after reading it.

When we come to the museum to raise the camera and press the shutter, should we ask ourselves, what kind of audience do I belong to?

Example 2: Taking photos is also a visit.

Wang Chuan (Vice Chairman and Painter of Zhenjiang Federation of Literary and Art Circles, Jiangsu Province)

I just came back from the Mogao Grottoes Museum a few days ago and negotiated with them about taking pictures. Shooting is not allowed in caves, I understand, and shooting is not allowed in replicas. I said it was for research, not; I want to write a manuscript, but I can't; Turn off the flash; I just don't let it be filmed, so I get angry.

Of course, not only at home, but also abroad. Most museums are allowed to take pictures, but many are not allowed to take pictures. The Louvre is allowed. Even if you photograph the Mona Lisa, it is not the Orsay Museum.

Van Gogh's art exhibition is being held, but you are not allowed to bring a camera. You are only allowed to take photos from a distance in the cafe outside the exhibition hall. The Prado Art Museum in Madrid is not good either, even though the Goyate Exhibition is being held. Chinese painting in Washington

Gallery and new york Metropolis, it's ok to take photos, but the smaller Ontario Art Museum is much more strict. As soon as you take out your camera, it is equivalent to breaking the law. Take it back at once. I can only draw speed.

Write it.

It seems that not all museums or art galleries in the world are not allowed to take pictures, and the standard of not taking pictures is arbitrary. The National Museum of Egypt in Cairo does not allow filming, but the National Museums of India and Greece do.

The museum is completely open, no matter how many photos you take. If you want to say that the exhibits are precious, how can you compare with these countries? They have a huge number for you to shoot! Shooting is allowed in the Winter Palace, but not in Trechakov Gallery. Actually in

In museums in Nepal, the rules are much stricter. Librarians are like prison guards, watching you all the time. Say no as soon as you lift the camera!

Generally speaking, some museums are open.

Taking photos is allowed, but the exhibition in the temporary exhibition hall is not allowed, and there is even an extra charge. According to some regulations, hard objects such as sculptures, bronzes and furniture are allowed to take pictures, but they are not allowed to take pictures in painting galleries and literature museums, and certainly not.

Use a flash. Some countries have made special laws and regulations. If you want to take pictures, you must buy a photo ticket. Those who paid and those who didn't, all took pictures with great fanfare. Who can tell the difference? Besides, taking pictures is allowed in foreign countries.

There are many museums, but few museums in China allow taking pictures. It's strange that big museums allow taking pictures, but some small museums don't!

Because of personal preferences and professional needs,

Every time I go to the museum, I need to take photos of the exhibits besides looking at those rare treasures carefully. Although there are albums and CDs for sale, they are not as good as my own point of view, just as I never listen to commentators.

I will take some details according to my own needs, some places that others don't pay attention to, but many printed materials won't.

Of course, the reason why we are not allowed to take pictures is because of those gestures.

Foreign aunts and Chinese aunts who go in with cameras and take pictures at will in front of famous paintings regard the exhibition as tourists visiting the park and photographers taking pictures everywhere. They want to visit here and take photos with famous paintings.

No matter how strict the regulations are, it is difficult to resist their snooping and mobile phones, and they will shoot whenever they find a machine. Not only take pictures, but also flash. It is difficult for any shrewd administrator to distinguish between researchers and ordinary tourists.

I'm not angry about taking pictures.

If there is a photographer, the audience will not be allowed to take pictures. If there are picture books for sale, they will not be able to take pictures. This is tantamount to throwing the children away with the bath water. Although the motivation for taking pictures is different from that of aunts, so am I.

A follower, but I am firmly opposed to the rule that the museum is not allowed to take pictures. Since there is a museum, visiting and taking pictures are the same right. We have no reason to deprive the audience of this right, as long as they can abide by the rules and not destroy the exhibits. Because taking pictures is also a visit.

In addition, like the classification of movies, maybe buying tickets to take pictures is also a way?

Example 3: The audience needs a sense of existence.

Peng De (Professor and critic of Xi Academy of Fine Arts)

Photos, albums and media have fully revealed an exhibition, but for the audience, he needs a feeling of being present, because the photos belong to him, and it is reasonable for the audience to pursue this feeling of being present. We used to

After going to some foreign art galleries, it is not allowed to take pictures, mainly for two reasons: first, flash is harmful to oil painting; Second, some works involve copyright, and they will be shot in detail with photos without sufficient publicity.

The heart is copied and imitated.

I think we can take such a way that museums and art galleries provide the audience with the opportunity to download the exhibition images and shoot all the works in advance, so that the audience can copy the relevant information quickly with their mobile phones. It is necessary to establish such a mechanism. In addition to the requirements of being present, many viewers are also very concerned about the work itself, especially those in the art circle. They really need clearer pictures of their works. If the exhibition hall can be provided to them free of charge, this contradiction will be solved.

As an artist, I hope all art galleries and museums can shoot freely without flash. Some audiences are fans of this artist. They don't necessarily know artists, let alone artists, but they like artists. If the artist is present, next to the work, some viewers are particularly willing to take photos with him or take him as the background. This kind of psychology should be considered. It seems a bit unkind if the exhibition shuts out these enthusiastic audiences. This is what I felt when I visited art galleries in America and Europe.

The art museum in China has just started and should be more open. We should arouse ordinary people's interest in art and attract their attention through tolerance. I think it is more important to allow or encourage the audience to participate in artistic activities before improving the quality of the audience. It is suggested that each exhibition or exhibition hall can invite some volunteers and painters to pay the fees, and they will cooperate with the art museum to manage the site, so that the visit can be carried out in an orderly manner and some unexpected things can be avoided. More and more people will visit the art gallery. There are many exhibitions now. There may still be some people on the first day of the opening ceremony, but there will be few people on the second day, which is not good.

Professional appeal: no photos.

Respect others: don't take pictures.

Chen Lvsheng (Deputy Director of China National Museum)

Regarding the question of whether museums can take pictures, from the current world, most museums and art galleries can take pictures, but quite a few museums and art galleries can't. I think taking pictures has something to do with taking pictures.

It is difficult to make uniform regulations within a professional scope. Because all museum managers are based on their own museums and their own views on the audience.

The response to the request is different, so they will consider whether museums and art galleries can take photos from a professional perspective. What is the museum for? What is the function of the museum? Obviously, it is not clear in a few words.

It's comprehensive, but it can be said for sure that museums are not places that attract countless people to take photos here like parks. The museum is here to see the exhibition and appreciate the exhibits, so in the museum, I want the audience to stay in their own places.

Appreciate historical relics and artworks instead of taking them as the background.

As far as photographing itself is concerned, most museums now have their own officials.

Website and corresponding publications. The pictures released by official website are much higher than those taken by himself. In particular, several of the most important museums under the Smithsonian Institution in the United States have released millions of collections in high definition.

Pictures for academic research. Like oil paintings and important cultural relics displayed through glass cabinets, the quality of pictures taken by non-professionals or ordinary mobile phones is far from that published by museums.

Than. Therefore, no matter what major you study or what hobbies you have, when you go to the museum, you should focus on the works you appreciate instead of wasting precious opportunities and time.

Focus and view composition, or spend time in search to eliminate all kinds of reflections.

Of course, as far as the ethics of taking pictures is concerned, it should not affect others to watch at first. I often have this experience when I think about it.

To see a work, someone happened to be taking pictures; In order to respect the photographer, I had to avoid and let him take pictures. This has caused great inconvenience to other viewers and will also have an impact on others. Therefore, Bo

Except for the special needs of museums, it is unnecessary for the general public to spend precious time and opportunities to take photos. At the same time, I think the most important thing to respect historical relics and art is to express it here.

Appreciation and interpretation of some historical relics and works of art, rather than taking pictures. Because precious cultural relics and important artworks in various museums also have many pictures and albums published. Renoir's Dance of Pancake Mill

Take the exhibition as an example. It is a collection of Orsay Museum. All the picture books have pictures of this work. Even if the Orsay Museum allows taking photos, more than 95% people use amateur mobile phones or ordinary cameras.

Taking pictures, its clarity and imaging are incomparable with published albums and printed pictures, and even the quality of postcards sold in souvenir shops. So why shoot them yourself? And these masterpieces are all in front.

Crowded people, instead of being surrounded by crowded cameras, it is better to put down your camera and patiently appreciate even part of it, and its harvest is far better than getting a low-quality image.

Therefore, some other museums, such as the Orsay Museum, are not allowed to take photos, and everyone has an equal opportunity to watch and visit, which is in line with the museum's values. So, I appreciate it.

The decision that some museums are not allowed to take pictures, such as the Orsay Museum. Of course, I also have my own opinion. Photographs are not allowed in Orsay Museum. For example, I have been to Orsay Museum several times to study its architectural space and correlation.

Some professional problems, because after all, the old railway station was rebuilt, are not allowed to take pictures, which is very inconvenient for professional researchers like me. Of course, we have special channels for professionals to get photos.

Opportunity. But even if I have the opportunity to take pictures, I won't spend my precious time taking those exhibits. Therefore, the most important thing for different museums to make different decisions about whether to take pictures is that museum managers should be conscious.

The audience and collections of the museum should have their own position in understanding and cognition and in shaping the values of the museum. I don't agree with what others say, and I don't agree to let the public vote like the French Museum Association. You can imagine.

However, almost 90% of the public vote is to allow taking pictures because everyone needs it. After all, quite a few people are at a loss after entering the museum, and quite a few people are interested in things that used to be in books.

The classic masterpieces they see all retain an initial impulse, so it is understandable that they will use habitual actions to get images as souvenirs. For the general public, as a professional unit, we should give appropriate guidance and tell the public how to visit museums and stay in front of those masterpieces instead of taking a photo.

For the National Museum of China, a museum with an average of more than 20,000 people every day, our public quality is actually mixed. In the exhibition commemorating the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and France,

The interaction led to physical conflict, and the mobile phone that took pictures flew out and hit the frame, which almost affected the safety of the exhibits, leading us to make a decision not to take pictures the next day. At present, the museum is such a place.

The public * * * cultural place is not a park, not some ordinary public * * * cultural places, but a professional unit with strong professionalism. In such a professional unit, we should establish our own professional demands. We have to make sure

The audience has a good visiting order and can also ensure the safety of the exhibits. Of course, this does not include the impact of dazzling flash on some sensitive materials.

As far as a citizen's civilization degree and his civilization elements are concerned.

In terms of quality, disputes caused by taking photos, possible interference to others, physical conflicts caused by taking photos, etc. It may become an important accident in the exhibition hall, or it may cause anxiety in the museum.

Damage to the collection. For example, in a relatively narrow space, especially in many museums abroad, there are no guardrails. In order to get a good angle, you may unconsciously take a step or a few steps back.

Wait, it may hurt the exhibits behind, and it may also affect other viewers when obtaining the angle. In museums and art galleries, there is no need to seek a unified standard for taking pictures.

A library can establish its own professional standards, and formulate a basic principle that the audience must abide by according to its own professional standards, that is, let you take pictures, you can take pictures or not; But when you're not allowed to take pictures,

You can't take pictures. This is respect for the museum, respect for museum values, respect for cultural relics and works of art, and respect for other audiences.

Ex. 4: Art galleries should be more humane.

Pan Jialai (Deputy Secretary General of Zhejiang Art Criticism Research Association)

If the customer is the god of the merchant, then the audience is the god of the art museum. All the work of art galleries and museums is to provide high-quality services to audiences at all levels and meet their reasonable needs in art galleries.

The primary position of the museum work is to make convenient arrangements for the display, explanation, reproduction (photographing) and other aspects of the collection, so as to maximize the social benefits of the collected works of art and cultural relics. This is a public welfare undertaking of art galleries and museums.

The nature of the industry is also the original intention of the state to invest heavily in the construction of art galleries and museums.

On reflection, we do have a lot of room for improvement in this respect, such as many art galleries in China.

The museum has a rule that it is forbidden to shoot exhibits, which I think is unreasonable. Domestic tourists have little access to excellent works of art and precious cultural relics. On the premise of not damaging the exhibits,

At present, the requirement to shoot (copy) exhibits for further study and research is completely justified and reasonable. Museums should not only be banned, but also be as convenient as possible.

In this regard, foreign countries

Some art galleries and museums do better, such as the Louvre in France. In the Louvre, there is only one sign prohibiting flashing lights. If your camera is equipped with a flash, the staff will politely come forward to explain. Besides, look.

Many people have no obstacles in shooting, and works of fine arts in various periods, including world masterpieces commonly seen in western art history monographs, can be shot freely. Not only that, there are more intimate designs in the museum. First, the main venue is big.

Many of them make good use of natural light, and soft light shines from the high transparent zenith and is evenly distributed throughout the exhibition hall. Second, almost all the works are not packed in glass frames, so that the audience can

The best viewing effect can be obtained by watching the work in the state closest to nature, and the color reproduction of the remake photo is also the closest to the original.

These two humanized designs fully reflect their right.

The trust and respect of the audience put the feelings of the audience at the core and the most important position. Most large art galleries in China were built in recent years, but many aspects failed to absorb the successful experience of foreign art galleries.

What a pity. For example, a large number of artificial light sources are used in venues, which changes the original color of artworks, separates exhibits from glass curtain walls, and brings artificial obstacles to viewing. Others make the exhibition hall look like a cave.

Darkness is easy to cause drowsiness and fatigue. This arrangement does not conform to the laws of nature, which reduces the exhibition effect and consumes energy, which is not worth the loss. The reason is that I still can't think from the standpoint of the audience.

For reference, please adopt it if you are satisfied.