Seeing the following composition topic, I have mixed feelings, and my heart is very complicated, moving and sentimental. I was moved by my colleagues' love for Chinese. Sadly, Chinese teaching has become a tool for exam-oriented education, and extreme utilitarianism seems to drown out the beauty of Chinese. Learning Chinese is only to cope with exams, and whether it can be improved quickly is the only yardstick to test the quality of teaching.

Read the following materials and write as required. (60 points)

When marking papers, teachers of mathematics, physics, chemistry and other subjects often complain to Mr. China: "Students can't even understand the questions! How to do the problem without cursing? "

Academician Zhong Nanshan, the mainstay of epidemic prevention and control in COVID-19, recently shared his learning experience: "Learning Chinese well is the key, and learning Chinese well can analyze, synthesize and summarize things."

Recently, 32 anti-epidemic gratitude posters released by Wuhan have won numerous praises. "Next March, let's go upstairs to watch the spring breeze", "Eight Fujian people come to help, Jiangcheng is blessed" ... 32 beautiful places, with 32 unique words, make people feel beautiful and full of hope.

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang responded to the US denigration of China's anti-epidemic efforts: "Don't do whatever you want, do whatever you want." This is what Mencius said, which means that if you don't succeed in doing things, you must find the reason from yourself. A large number of netizens praised him for his "good rebuttal" and also felt: "I didn't learn Chinese well, I can't understand Chinese!"

Student Xiao Chen often preaches the futility of Chinese learning in class. As a classmate of Xiao Chen, what do you think of Chinese learning after reading the above materials? Please write a paper refuting Xiao Chen.

Requirements: combine materials, choose your own perspective, determine your own ideas, and draw up your own title; Conforming to the identity and situation; Conform to stylistic features; Do not copy or copy; Do not disclose personal information; Not less than 800 words.

How can Chinese learning be useless?

Text/Xiang Bin

When "attaching importance to reason over literature" has gradually become an educational epidemic, some liberal arts subjects are naturally marginalized from learning. No, Xiao Chen, a classmate in the class, has been preaching "the futility of Chinese studies" recently. It is not difficult to imagine that a group of classmates will become his supporters.

Why did Xiao Chen become an advocate of "China's uselessness"? It's just that he finds Chinese difficult to learn and gets marks too slowly. Chinese is not "extra points" like mathematics and physics, or it has no "scientific and technological content". China people can't solve practical problems for nothing. The essence of all these arguments is actually short-sighted and superficial "utilitarianism". To put it bluntly, it is either the syndrome of score-only theory under the baton of the college entrance examination, or the adverse reaction of one-sided pursuit of practical value.

In fact, it is more than "Xiao Chen's classmate"? It is estimated that "Mr. Chen's parents" or "Mr. Chen" are also questioning the significance of Chinese studies. As a result, more and more "Xiao Chen classmates" have become confident: learning mathematics and physics well is not afraid to travel all over the world; Learn math and physics well and get into a top university. As for Chinese, the score is average, and the study is not bad.

? Measuring the value of Chinese studies by how many points you scored in the exam is the same as buying food and selling meat in the vegetable market, which is a bit philistine. Chinese study, only to the college entrance examination? Obviously, this is absurd and short-sighted. Moreover, this is a response to the disease of education, which is not light and can be cured. Chinese, from babbling to dying words, has been with us all our lives. How can such a discipline, which runs through almost a lifetime, be "useless"?

? I often hear math and physics teachers complain that students can't understand the questions and make inaccurate judgments. Who should I call this board? China? I'm afraid I'm going to call someone who doesn't study Chinese seriously. However, regardless of literature, history and philosophy, Chinese can't pass, and other liberal arts subjects are hard to learn well. Speaking with your mouth open and writing with a pen, everything is inseparable from Chinese learning. It is equally natural to eat when you are hungry and drink when you are thirsty, but some people say that "Chinese studies are useless." Isn't it a lie to lie with your eyes open?

And the use of Chinese learning, and more than that? When you saw the sentence "Eight Fujian people come to help, Jiangcheng is blessed" in Wuhan Thanksgiving poster, were you moved? When you hear the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs quote "Don't do the right thing, do the right thing for yourself", can you empathize with the sage Mencius? Sinology is not only the use of language, but also the aesthetics of literature. Continuous culture and even silent infiltration nourish our hearts and lives. Academician Zhong Nanshan said that "learning Chinese well is the most important thing", so it is not worthwhile to compliment Chinese learning. Xiao Chen, a senior high school student, said that "Chinese studies are useless".

Advise Xiao Chen not to spread the "useless theory of Chinese studies". It's a big deal to mistake yourself for others. I also suggest that all students keep their eyes open and be smart, and don't be tempted by the "useless theory of Chinese studies."

Brief comments:

This paper is adapted from "44-point Composition in Examination Room", which follows the original idea and tone, but modifies the language expression and implements the writing task. The refutation process directly aims at the "useless theory of Chinese studies", and the refutation process is in accordance with the requirements, combined with the composition materials, highlighting the refutation significance.