Along the way, it is a basic symbol to participate in academic competition and make original contributions on the same internationally recognized platform.
So what kind of paper is qualified? This paper puts forward some suggestions for your reference.
Publishing academic papers in international core journals is the tribute of basic researchers, the big country is the country, and the small country is the country.
The number of papers published by a research group or individual in high-impact SC] journals is obviously basic research.
A more objective sign of the level. Robert? Preface to Dai's How to Write and Publish Scientific Papers
The speech pointed out that "the evaluation of a scientist, starting from a graduate student, is mainly not to see what he is doing in the laboratory."
His alertness depends not on his inherent knowledge of a wide or narrow research field, but also on his intelligence and charm.
But look at his work. They are famous (or not famous) for it. "He led American microbiology.
Will be published for 19, and be the editor-in-chief of Bacteriology magazine. His profound insights are worth thinking about by colleagues engaged in basic research.
Originality and uniqueness are the life of a newspaper.
As Qiu Xin Chishi and others pointed out in Re-discussion of Scientific Ethics, the papers published in international core journals are originally
It should be a new observation and experimental fact described for the first time in the world, and a concept and model first proposed.
Formula, the equation established for the first time, also includes the new generalization and new provisions of the existing important observation (experiment) facts.
Perfection of the law. Associated with originality, any periodical does not want to be published in or by other magazines.
A paper published in one language or a slightly different form. The authoritative journal of solar physics "Space Physics"
Harvey, editor-in-chief of Solar physics, once mentioned that a few authors published their main achievements in Chinese.
And send it to space physics. He stressed that this was allowed in the past, but it is not allowed now. It is an accepted principle that an author cannot publish the main results published in peer-reviewed magazines to other magazines in different forms.
Papers published in international core journals should not only be original, but also have remarkable achievements.
The development of the discipline has been promoted. In Harvey's words, "at least one or two other researchers will read this.
Articles, and use these results to publish their own work. "The test of the significance of the results is that the paper is cited.
How much was used? Authors should pay attention to the citation of papers and the evaluation of their work by international academic circles.
Price, including the positive and critical aspects, pays special attention to the different understanding of the results published by colleagues.
. This is an important way to improve your research level.
Fully evaluate the existing works and reflect the author's academic level.
Whether the previous works have been objectively and fully evaluated is often judged by critics and readers.
An important aspect of artistic style. Some of our authors are often willing to quote the works of famous foreign scholars, which is a bit "wordy"
It must be called Greece, but it doesn't pay enough attention to the works published by domestic counterparts. Sometimes China scholars are the first.
The work done has not been fully evaluated by our domestic counterparts. More appropriate references to domestic counterparts.
Work should be advocated. However, don't learn from a few Japanese authors, who rarely quote Japan.
Articles other than scholars. Some colleagues cited a considerable number of formulas in their papers, but did not list the sources of the formulas.
Let readers not know whether it was developed by the author or quoted other people's previous works. In principle, in addition to textbooks,
To understand equations and expressions, the deduction of specific purposes, specific articles, parts and problems, as long as it is not for
The author's own works should list the source and applicable conditions; You should even list the author's previous works.
The corresponding literature, so that readers can refer to the author when necessary, should be clear on the basis of full evaluation of the previous works.
Point out your initial contribution in your current job. This is the performance of the author's responsibility for science, and it is a good academic paper that must be made clear at the beginning.
The content is clear.
Pay special attention to the title, abstract, chart and conclusion of the paper.
Every author has the experience of reading a lot of papers. Readers' habit of reading papers is generally to browse the catalogue first.
Only if you are interested in the topic, are you willing to turn over the relevant papers; For a paper interested in a subject, the reader comes first.
Read the abstract of the paper; If you are still interested in the abstract, you will look at the chart of the paper, because the chart is often the clearest.
It accurately reflects the results of the paper. After reading the chart, if the reader is still interested, continue to read the conclusion of the paper. Usually only a few readers will read the full text of the paper.
The author should know clearly that the title of the paper will be read by thousands of readers. For every word of the topic
Choose carefully and reflect the content of the paper with the least words.
Correctly treat peer review opinions and rejections.
The reviewers of international core journals are mostly authoritative scholars in various fields. The magazine publishing association often consults the editorial board.
Opinions, choose the best review team. Comments are free. Most reviewers are extremely serious about their work.
. We should respect the opinions of peer review, carefully analyze every criticism and suggestion, and revise the paper accordingly.
. For the opinions that you think are incorrect, you should be extremely cautious, answer them seriously, and talk to the reviewers reasonably.
Discuss it. How to treat papers rejected by magazines is often a difficult problem for the author. Rejection must be analyzed here.
Reason. The first kind of rejection is a kind of "complete rejection", and the editor-in-chief usually gives an opinion on this kind of article.
I don't want to read it anymore. It's meaningless to send such an article again. One is that the article contains some useful figures.
According to the data, the editor-in-chief rejected such articles because of serious defects in data or analysis. The author of this kind of article may wish
Let's put it aside first, and then revise it when we find more extensive evidence to support it or have a clearer conclusion.
New "articles were sent to the same magazine. The editor-in-chief will usually consider accepting this kind of article again. At least in the past two years
Two reviewers complained to the author that some colleagues in China submitted their papers intact after being rejected by a magazine.
The manuscript was sent to another magazine and they were invited to review it again. They are very disgusted with this. Institute of literature
Of course it was rejected. When talking about this problem, The astrophysics (The, Astrophysical, Journ)
Thomas, the scientific editor of al), said: "It is a terrible mistake to send a paper to another magazine without modification after being rejected by one magazine. Usually, the reviewers have done serious work to point out the problems of the paper and put forward suggestions for revision. If the author ignores these suggestions, it is time and effort.
Real waste. At the same time, publishing a bad article is a serious damage to the author's scientific reputation. "Real?
Internationally, academic journals with different impact factors have different acceptance standards and requirements for papers. If it is rejected,
The paper is not because of mistakes in the manuscript, but because it is not important enough or innovative enough. The author considered the critic carefully.
After careful revision, the manuscript can be sent to academic journals with low impact factors. It is worth noting that
Due to the limitation of knowledge, some prejudices and even different academic opinions, the reviewers made mistakes and suggested rejecting the manuscript.
It will happen. There are two examples of how to deal with this situation. Recently, a young man's paper was published in a magazine.
Refuse. After repeated discussions and tests, we judged that the reviewer was wrong. In order to publish the paper in time, we
It is suggested that the author should write back to the editor-in-chief politely and seriously, point out the mistakes made by the reviewers, and ask the editor-in-chief to forward his opinions to the reviewers, and then withdraw the manuscript and discuss it again.
Make necessary improvements and send them to another magazine with a higher impact factor. The paper was immediately accepted and well received.
Price. In this case, the paper was sent to other magazines without major revision. But the author has the responsibility.
Please ask the chief editor to forward his comments to the reviewers. In this case, it is not appropriate for the author to send other magazines instead.
Be restricted and blamed. But the premise is that the results of the paper have been repeatedly tested to confirm the correctness of the paper.
Hold on tight A paper by the author's group was published in an important magazine two and a half years later. The main reasons are as follows: First,
Several reviewers questioned the reliability of vector magnetic field measurement in China and disagreed with the publication of this paper. right of way
After repeated consultation and reflection, Wei's colleagues confirmed that the research and measurement methods adopted were completely accurate.
Definitely reliable. The author spent nearly two years discussing with the reviewers, not only the paper was published, but also with the reviewers.
The author has established a good relationship with the editor-in-chief, and this paper has been well cited in the world after its publication.
Strive to improve English writing.
English is not our mother tongue, and English writing is the most difficult part in English learning. SCI papers and citations in China are biased.
Less, in addition to the limitation of basic research level, language barriers can not be ignored. Every basic researcher must
Improving English writing ability is an arduous task. Here are three successful experiences for reference. China branch
Professor Hu Youqiu of the University of Technology always copies the English revisions made by the reviewers separately from those made in his own manuscript.
Compare them one by one in the book. Think hard and learn by rote, and improve your English writing level bit by bit. He sent it.
Papers sent to international core journals are often called well-written by reviewers. The National Solar Observatory of the United States has one
Internal peer review system, its main purpose is to ensure the correctness of the paper, but also for research.
The benefits of mutual influence and tempering. Papers without internal review cannot be sent to magazines. Senior solar physicist
Sarah and Martin suggest to find some papers that can be used as examples to read intensively and learn how to organize and write English well. she
Special reference is made to the paper of the late famous astrophysicist Zwan, which can be used as a model essay to follow. Finish the first draft of the paper
After that, be sure to do a spelling check to avoid simple spelling mistakes. If you are not sure about your English writing,
It is necessary to ask a colleague with good English and his foreign counterparts to turn off English. In order to fundamentally improve the English level of China scholars.
English level, we suggest that graduate students must offer English writing courses. When writing English, we really need to play.
Connecting flight