Writing characteristics of Reading Meng Changjun Biography: This is a comment on writing created by Wang Anshi, a writer in the Northern Song Dynasty, and the first comment on writing in the history of China. The whole structure is divided into four layers:

1. On the first floor, the author puts forward the views to be refuted, indicating the traditional views of the world on Meng Changjun. Clean and straightforward, set up the target to refute.

2. On the second level, firstly, interjections are used to strengthen the tone, and then the statement that Meng Changjun can become a scholar is directly refuted, which is a warning and a powerful rebuttal.

3. At the third level, turn around, deepen the refutation, put forward the scholar's standard view by reducing to absurdity, and refute Meng Changjun's superficial and one-sided view with facts. The purpose of an article is to come up with new ideas and go straight to the root.

4. The fourth layer continues the above, and further analyzes the reasons why Meng Changjun can't get a scholar with logical reasoning. The whole article revolves around the theme that Meng Changjun can't be the top scholar, sweeping away the traditional view that Meng Changjun can be the top scholar. Although it has been turned over for three times, it is rigorous and natural, fully discussed, sharp in words, focused, overwhelming and has indisputable logical power. The language is concise and profound, the words are short and long, and there is a ruler thousands of miles away. Read cadence, melodious, and harmonious.