In the current workplace situation, the promotion system of professional titles is the chief culprit of academic fraud. Without subversive changes to the promotion system, it is impossible to change the status quo of academic fraud simply by cracking down on academic fraud. In fact, it is not difficult to understand that it is almost impossible to evaluate and promote professional titles without academic fraud without one vote veto in the current promotion mechanism. But if you choose fraud, you may experience risks, and comparing the two will definitely lead to the most rational choice. Of course, since the frequent exposure of academic fraud, some provinces and industries have improved some disadvantages of professional title promotion. The most representative thing is that papers and scientific research achievements are no longer necessary conditions, but academic papers and scientific research achievements are still important reference standards in the evaluation index of professional titles. This change only reduces the entry threshold.

The promotion of professional titles is a great confusion and pressure for many people. Academic fraud will bear moral pressure, but following the rules does not guarantee the corresponding title. In the process of interweaving the two contradictions, most people will take risks to try academic fraud. Although it will become a great risk in the future, as long as the risk can be overcome, the problem will be better solved. Even if it is discovered and rejected by one vote, it will dispel the inner thoughts, but you can be content with the status quo or seek something else. Of course, even if you don't choose academic fraud in order to retain your promotion qualification, the promotion and evaluation of professional titles will be endless waiting, and even hard-won opportunities will be lost because someone chooses academic fraud at risk. These problems are objective factors that make it difficult to improve the current situation of counterfeiting.

From this perspective, although one-vote veto can form a deterrent to a certain extent, it can't play a decisive role for most elites in the workplace. The main reason for the repeated prohibition of academic fraud is the irrationality of the cautious system. Despite the obvious changes and progress, the fundamental problem has not changed. In western countries, the talent training mechanism is very successful, and academic fraud has been well curbed because it has no necessity and value. This is also our country.