As a research dog whose graduation task is more important than Mount Tai, writing papers and submitting papers is one of the mountains that weigh on their heads. Tutors call on students to send SCI articles and "urge" students to face difficulties every day, but for "novices" who have just come into contact with this field, they are at a loss ~

"I copied a lot of articles in the world", so I told myself that I was learning from others, but my brain ached when I saw it ~

In fact, to put it bluntly, SCI scientific papers belong to the category of practical writing.

A scientific paper is just a synthesis of expository and argumentative articles. Generally speaking, a scientific paper is an argumentative one. You put forward your point of view, and then quote some examples (mainly your observations, discoveries, data and charts, etc. ) to support your arguments, assumptions and opinions. In every argument, you can describe all kinds of results in detail, and describe them in detail. Isn't that explanatory text? So a little decomposition, scientific papers are not so tall, that is, the combination of argumentative papers and expository papers.

The purpose of scientific papers is to provide information and clearly tell readers what problems you have raised, what means you have used to solve these problems, and what conclusions you can draw from them. The article must also be readable, clear, accurate and concise. Think about the pain of an article. If you read an article with confusing logic and tasteless taste, how do you feel?

There are usually two readers of scientific papers: first, judges, including editors and reviewers, help journals determine whether the papers are suitable for publication. Therefore, the power of life and death of this article is in their hands. Don't annoy them. Write and change according to their opinions completely, or you will be nothing in the future. You can't help but sigh:

Second, readers, they are the ultimate goal of your article. Yes, you wrote it for them. When writing an article, you should read the reader's mind. You are very good. You are very good. Don't let them feel this way after reading your article:

Scientific papers naturally have their own frame structure. General papers are usually divided into five parts:

1. Introduce the background story and current research progress of the writing topic, and clarify your research purpose, new findings and conclusions in combination with the background;

2. Materials and methods provide readers with detailed experimental steps and information, and describe the experiments and methods involved in their own research as much as possible;

3. The results are divided into several paragraphs, and my past achievements are put out one by one to support my arguments and assumptions;

4. Discuss the significance of the results, look forward to the vision of the research, put forward further ideas, and write some thoughts in the part of "flying yourself";

5. Conclusion To sum up your research results, you should point to the key points, that is, "just say the last sentence" in the program to tell the truth, so that readers can understand your conclusion.

Other parts of the article also include: title, author and subordinate unit, abstract, references, thanks, author's contribution, source of funds and appendix. If you have a lot of other data that can't be written in the text, don't forget to write supplementary materials. There is also a world where you can show yourself ~