Haha, I really sympathize with your experience. I think what you said is very reasonable. It is also a reminder to friends who are engaged in human resources work: the preparation for the interview should not be sloppy! I think they may be unprepared. They didn't examine your basic information carefully, and your excellent performance in the interview made you successfully enter the second interview. It was not until a decision was made that some conditions did not match the position. It shouldn't be intentional, and don't be too angry.

Of course, it is not excluded that some enterprises have "unscrupulous" HR arrogance. In order to show their works, they get a bunch of people to interview and then send them away one by one, enjoying the pleasure of "pointing out life and deciding life and death", but such people are a minority after all. Most HR is very professional and quality.

What's more, according to my work experience, the reasons for ultimately rejecting candidates are not always "real", that is to say, the recruiter said that he could not be admitted for one reason or another, not necessarily this reason, but actually there may be other reasons.

For example, people who used to feel good about themselves exposed "fatal" shortcomings when they were re-elected; Or a new competitor, both of them meet the requirements and that person's salary requirements are actively reduced, and so on. . .

The interview process is actually a self-marketing process. Since it is marketing, it is not self-activity, but there will be competition. Therefore, the final success or failure of the interview is influenced by many details and factors, some of which are beyond personal control.

I think looking for a job is like falling in love, sometimes it takes a little bit of fate. The interview is not successful, not necessarily because you are not good enough, but also because you are not the type that people "like". It's best not to get too entangled.