On March 23rd this year, the forensic doctor of new york Police Headquarters examined a corpse and concluded that the man died of a gunshot wound to the head.
Strike.
The name of the deceased was ronald opus. According to his suicide note, he originally wanted to walk down from the top of a ten-story building.
The department committed suicide by jumping off a building. However, when he jumped from the building and passed in front of the ninth floor, a bullet was shot out of the window.
Come out and shoot him on the spot.
After investigation, the police found that neither the deceased nor the shooter knew one thing-the workers were working on the eighth floor at that time.
A safety net has just been installed there, which means that if ronald opus hadn't been shot, his suicide plan would have been destroyed.
Actually, boating is not what you want.
But according to the law, generally speaking, if a person commits suicide in a planned way and eventually dies, even if he has committed suicide.
If the change of the killing process fails to meet the wishes of the suicide, then the person should also be determined to commit suicide according to law.
However, when the police investigated the bullets fired from the ninth floor, the nature of the case changed again. At that time, the ninth floor.
An old couple had an argument and were quarrelling. The old man pulled out his gun to intimidate the old lady, and then pulled out his gun.
The trigger, but the bullet didn't hit the old lady, but flew out of the window and hit ronald opus. abide by the law
Legally, if a person wants to kill A, but kills B by mistake, then he should still be convicted of murder against B, because
Therefore, this case should be a murder case.
When the old man was accused of murder, the old man and the old lady agreed that they both thought there was a gun in the gun.
There are no bullets in the noodles. The old man explained that it was his responsibility for many years to intimidate the old lady with an unloaded gun.
A practice that has always existed when wives quarrel. He didn't mean to kill his wife. If the old couple's words are true, then
This is a case of manslaughter.
The crux of the matter is under what circumstances and by whom. The police found one in the investigation.
A witness testified that the son of the old couple had seen the gun loaded six weeks before the murder.
Bullets. The police learned in a more in-depth investigation that because the old lady decided to stop providing financial support to her adult son, this
A son bears a grudge and intends to kill. Knowing his father's habit of threatening the old lady with a gun, he gave him a gun.
Loaded with bullets, hoping to kill my mother by my father's hand. Because this son knows what it's like to load a gun,
If so, even if he didn't pull the trigger himself, he should be charged with murder. So, this case has become
The old couple's son murdered ronald opus.
However, after further investigation, the police found that the son of the old couple was actually the deceased Rona.
De Hoops himself. He was depressed because his plan to kill people with a knife never succeeded, so in March 1994,
On the 23rd, he decided to commit suicide by jumping off the top of the tenth floor, but was killed by a bullet fired from the ninth floor window.
Yes In other words, ronald opus committed suicide, so the case was finally identified as suicide.
piece