I think this is a very good question. Although we have been learning this, we haven't really understood it clearly from the definition and concept.
For this concept, I also briefly combed my own cognition and the improvement of group discussion.
Three-stage courses based on Chaos University: rationality, Zhe Ke and the world of ideas, roughly classified.
In fact, there are still some doubts about thinking mode and logical thinking, which comes first, chicken or egg.
In principle, before human beings began to evolve, we should have a thinking model (the structure of reaction), and then have the ability of logical thinking (the ability to make thinking models), but if logical thinking creates thinking models (tools) from the perspective of initiative, we will discuss more about the acquired model.
Then this classification model has the conditions for establishment.
Figure 2. When exploring the structure of the fourth floor of Chaos University, we will find another bug: What is sensibility? If it must be separated, it is defined as the whole floor, at least in a narrow sense. It is called experience, or the original perceptual structure, or an instinct.
In order to facilitate a better understanding, let's first look at the advanced experience. In fact, when I go back to the first floor from the fourth floor, I prefer to feel primitive instinctively.
From the dimension of solving problems, such a four-story climbing structure is relatively complete.
If the structure of size can't be well explained, perhaps this picture can better explain the relationship between the two. Logical thinking, as a channel and tool for the transformation of old and new thinking modes, is called cognition.
In the final iteration diagram, the positions among cognition, logical thinking and thinking mode are better sorted out.
Finally, the students added a discussion about the right and wrong of the thinking mode itself and the right and wrong of the result.
Several feelings:
1, there are a lot of vague concepts behind the definition you think you know, which need to be clarified constantly and then expressed by new language symbols.
2. The more the truth is argued, the more obvious it is, and the emergence of group wisdom promotes the emergence of results.
3. The dimension of interpretation determines the dimension of expression.
4. Only by discussing the problem itself in a larger dimension can we solve the problem itself better.