I listened to a workplace class today, which was about the advancement of the workplace. I think it's interesting. He first mentioned that the blue-collar, middle-class and ruling class in the United States received completely different education.

The education received by the blue-collar class is solidified, which is somewhat similar to the current primary education, that is, rote memorization is given to children without training their thinking ability, because children only need to work in the assembly line to support their families and do not need to go out to commit crimes when they grow up.

The middle class receives a slightly higher education, which is the American education in our traditional understanding. They will train your thinking ability and logical ability, such as doing thesis defense and making beautiful ppt.

The education received by the ruling class is different again. The ruling class learns leadership, influence, decision-making power, and how to improve personal charm. They don't need to learn anything to please others They will become government officials and business leaders when they grow up. They just need to think about why they made this decision and bear the consequences of this decision.

There is no absolute right or wrong in many major events, which means that their decisions will not be right or wrong, but to be influential, he needs a large number of fans, and he needs to conquer a large number of people with personal charm.

How about the introduction of American education into China? We are still a developing country, unlike the United States. Our class has not completely solidified, which means that there are still many opportunities to achieve class leap. The ways and means by which Americans cultivate different classes have a certain guiding role for us to realize the leap of classes.