The expression "the beast returns to the cage" is often used to describe the implementation of some authority or rules. From the perspective of parents, this expression may be interpreted differently. There are two different views here:

1. Emancipation: For some parents, "putting animals in cages" can be understood as introducing a binding force, which helps to manage and guide children's behavior. Parents may think that such rules and restrictions can protect children from potential dangers and promote them to form good habits and behavior norms. From this perspective, "the return of the beast to the cage" is a kind of liberation, which allows parents to better fulfill their educational responsibilities and protect their children's rights and interests.

2. Constraints: Other parents may think that "the return of animals to cages" represents too strict and restrictive rules, which limits the freedom and personal development of children. From this perspective, parents may worry that such restrictions will deprive children of their independence and creativity, and restrict them from exploring the world and developing their own interests. These parents may think that children should have more autonomy and freedom, rather than being over-constrained.

It should be noted that parents' views on "releasing animals into cages" may vary from person to person and are influenced by factors such as culture, values and family background. It is important for parents to weigh various factors in the process of educating their children and find a balance point suitable for themselves and their children. This includes formulating reasonable rules and restrictions according to children's growth stages and characteristics, and giving children appropriate autonomy and personal development space.