Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Is it an administrative punishment or detention for the headmaster to misappropriate educational public funds to build a teaching building?
Is it an administrative punishment or detention for the headmaster to misappropriate educational public funds to build a teaching building?
Whether the principal misappropriates educational public funds to build a teaching building is an administrative punishment or detention depends on the amount of misappropriation.

According to the provisions of Article 384 of the Criminal Law of China, state functionaries take advantage of their positions: 1) misappropriate public funds for personal use and engage in illegal activities; 2) misappropriating a large amount of public funds for profit-making activities; 3) If the amount of misappropriation is relatively large and has not been returned for more than three months, it constitutes the crime of misappropriation of public funds. If it belongs to a large amount, rather than illegal resignation or profit-making activities, it is not possible to return it before the crime (before it is discovered by the judicial organs, competent departments or relevant units). At this time, your return is of great significance. If the amount of misappropriation of public funds is huge, it will be more than three months. Although all the principal and interest have been returned before the incident, it can be given a lighter punishment.

The crime of misappropriating public funds refers to the behavior of state functionaries who use their position to misappropriate public funds for personal use to engage in illegal activities, or misappropriate a large amount of public funds for profit-making activities, or misappropriate a large amount of public funds for more than three months. ?