Teacher Wei organized students to pay the basic study fee, and handed over the charging task to a student. The students who received the task took paper and pens and prepared to start charging in turn according to the order of seats. At this moment, Teacher Wei stopped him and said, "Use your watch." The student asked inexplicably, "Teacher, how to collect watches?" Teacher Wei smiled and said, "Don't worry, stand aside and think." After a while, the student said, "Teacher, you are very clever. I see. You want me to organize a' charging competition'. " Under the guidance of teacher Wei, the students in charge of charging organized a group charging competition. Taking the healthy group as a unit, the group leader is entrusted to charge, and the group with fast charging speed and error-free process wins (the specific competition rules are not detailed here). In this way, the fastest team collected all the money in only 10 minutes. The group leader put his wallet on a blank sheet of paper with his name and money written on it and gave it to the student in charge of charging. When the student in charge of charging wanted to give the paper bag to Mr. Wei, Mr. Wei inspired him to say, "Think again, is the charging process over?" Under the guidance of teacher Wei again, the students in charge of charging supervised and accompanied the group leaders to send the money to the accounting room. After accounting, it is confirmed that the amount of money handed in by each group is accurate, and the competition is also divided into "winners and losers" after paying the fees. An action that seems simple and even easy to arouse students' disgust is successfully completed in a pleasant atmosphere.

Self-examination/introspection

This educational case fully embodies the educational concept of "let students do what they can" put forward by Mr. Wei. By organizing the charging competition, the enthusiasm of students to participate in class collective work is mobilized, the ability of students to pay attention to details and constantly find solutions to problems is cultivated, the innovative spirit of students is stimulated, and their practical ability is improved. Isn't this the training goal of the new curriculum reform to some extent?

After reading this case, every teacher should reflect: Do we still "dare" to let students do things? In fact, there are many things that students can't do well, not because they are unwilling to do it, but because teachers dare not let them do it. At present, with the continuous introduction of various educational laws and regulations, administrative orders and detailed rules on the accountability of schools, as well as the increasing awareness of people's rights protection, schools and teachers are afraid to take responsibility, and students have fewer and fewer opportunities to do what they can. Some normal student activities, schools and teachers dare not organize students to participate, which is the helpless choice of some schools and teachers. Teacher Wei's bold and innovative approach is exactly what our current education lacks. It is "thankless" to charge students the necessary fees. Our traditional practice is that the teacher collects it himself. In the process of charging, teachers themselves are afraid of miscalculation, losing money or receiving counterfeit money, and they are afraid of the consequences, let alone students. However, Mr. Wei asked the students to do it, and at the same time, he lost no time to guide and guide the students in the process of charging. Reflecting on our education, how many students are not allowed to do things for fear of "accidents"? It is not a good idea to restrict students from doing things. It is wise to let students do what they can and do what can exercise their abilities. Teachers can do a good job of coordination and guidance. It can be said that it is time to call for and practice "let students do it themselves, let students observe it in person, let students express it in person, and let students summarize it in person".

Letting students do things does not mean that teachers can "give up" and students can do whatever they want. Let students do things, teachers should bear a responsibility, a responsibility to help students develop morally and spiritually. Before students do something, teachers must presuppose what students want to do and predict the difficulties they may encounter. Teachers should come up with several feasible schemes, so that they can "preview" the whole process of students' homework and anticipate possible problems in advance. After the teacher has a clear plan, he will guide the students to think twice and try new ways of thinking and doing things. Teachers should listen carefully to students' plans and steps, and then help them optimize the process of doing things. In the process of letting students do things, teachers should focus on guiding students to do things, and through timely and appropriate guidance, enhance students' confidence in doing things well, so that students can dare to face setbacks in the process of doing things. Reflecting on our education, in the process of guiding students to do things, many teachers criticize students more and guide them less; When students are discouraged, there are fewer opportunities to enhance their confidence. This situation must change.