Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to write an argumentative essay for the senior high school entrance examination
How to write an argumentative essay for the senior high school entrance examination
Writing an argumentative essay with the goal of proving the correctness of a certain point of view can usually be written according to the conventional thinking of "introduction" Talking about Gucci and Talking about Diligence are typical representatives of this kind of argumentative essays. Here are some key points that should be mastered when reading and writing this kind of argumentative paper with examples.

Introduction-put forward opinions and establish a general plan.

It is a common way to start this kind of argumentative paper by putting forward a clear and correct point of view with a positive judgment on the topic. Usually, opinions are put forward in the form of simple quotations, such as "talking about diligence", so that the view that "profound academic attainments come from diligence and studiousness" is obtained. You can also use a straight-to-the-point method, such as "talking about bones" in the first sentence, and directly put forward the view that "we China people have backbone". Once the viewpoint is put forward, the general outline of full-text selection and organization of argumentation materials is established. Pay attention to the use of this conventional method of beginning, which can help beginners correct the common problem that the beginning is too long and I don't know why it has been a long time.

Discussion-Explain the topic and summarize the discussion.

Don't rush to list the materials for argument after the viewpoint is put forward. Generally, we will discuss it from the following two aspects: First, we will give a brief explanation of the topic. For example, Tan closely followed the topic of "Gucci", not only quoted Mencius' famous words to explain the meaning of "heroism", but also revealed its basic characteristics of "unswervingly serving the progressive cause at that time" and explained the connotation of the topic in essence. Another example is "diligence", and the basic characteristics of "diligence" are explained by five "diligence". The second is to make an outline of the point of view. No matter "We Chinese are a nation with fine traditional virtues" talking about bones, "Many touching stories of our ancestors in bones …" or "On diligence", "People who have made achievements in ancient and modern times and at home and abroad have written a shining big word-diligence" on every page of their history, which is highly summarized in extremely concise language. It can be seen that this kind of argument plays an important role in argumentation proof. Consciously making such comments when writing can help us correct the common fault of being eager to list materials for argument and ignoring the transition of necessary comments.

Use materials together to demonstrate.

The basic requirement for writing the main part of this kind of argumentative paper is to demonstrate the correctness of the point of view with sufficient materials-factual arguments and theoretical arguments. In junior high school, the key point is to learn to carefully select and organize typical factual arguments. Generally speaking, there are two ways to organize factual arguments: one is that several typical materials each constitute a level to demonstrate, such as the main part of Tan, and three materials correspond to Mencius' three sentences, which are demonstrated in three levels from three aspects; One is to divide a variety of materials into several categories and demonstrate them at several levels, such as the main part of Qin Shuo. Six materials are divided into two categories and demonstrated at two levels. No matter what organizational form is adopted, each level should generally be written according to the conventional structure of "putting forward hierarchical arguments → summarizing one or several similar materials → essentially analyzing materials", that is, "dividing arguments into ten materials and ten arguments". The two levels of Qin Shuo's main body are typical examples. Although there are only two layers of "Ten Theories on Materials" in Tan, it is only to avoid repetition and omit the sub-theories. If it is supplemented by deceiving others, there are three sentences from Mencius. The establishment of sub-argument can not only expand the central argument concretely, but also make the argumentation process more coherent. The discussion after the material can be said to be the link between the material and the point of view, so that they can be integrated. Generally speaking, this discussion plays an important role in clearly revealing that "the materials used can completely prove the point of view". Sorting out these can help us to gradually correct the common problem of focusing only on material stacking and ignoring discussion and analysis.

Conclusion-Summarize the discussion and encourage it.

Summing up the discussion is to gather the full text at the end, so as to draw a conclusion and respond to the initial point of view. For example, "diligence" affirmed that "only diligence can make you a genius and achieve your career", and talking about the backbone emphasized the significance of the times, all of which wrapped the full text in a positive tone, summed up the language and echoed the views. The purpose of writing argumentative essays is not only to improve one's self-cultivation to guide one's actions, but also to inspire and inspire people. For example, the last sentence of Tan Gu directly calls on people to overcome difficulties and forge ahead courageously, while Tan Gu is more subtle. "I think everyone who is eager to gain true knowledge and achievements can appreciate the profound meaning of diligence." If it is encouragement and consolation, it should be concise and full of emotion, but it should also be decent and sincere, and its wording and tone should conform to its own status. As a famous scholar and mentor of young people, Wu Han can't exert his personality charm without inspiring others. Lin Jiazhen's approachable induction can make people think deeply. As a student, it is not appropriate to condescend to exhort and give orders.

The general ideas and specific methods of argumentative writing introduced above to prove the correctness of a certain point of view are highly operable. Beginners can get out of the predicament of argumentative writing if they can understand and master and train repeatedly.

The key to getting high marks is to have an integrated thinking in the senior high school entrance examination. Thank you.