I wanted to list every argument and argument for lz, but the more I wrote, the more depressed I became. Argumentative writing is a high school composition, right? In fact, this kind of problem came up. If I were you, I would write that cleverness has nothing to do with urban and rural areas. This is an argument, and the argument is 1. Intelligence includes IQ, EQ and adversity quotient. Children in cities may have good IQ, but they experience far fewer difficulties than children in rural areas, which may lead to their EQ and adversity quotient being inferior to those in rural areas. Give yourself an example. 2. Judging from the current social situation, children in cities generally develop better than children in rural areas, which is also affected by the adequacy of basic development and educational resources, and has no direct relationship with intelligence. 3. The turning point does not mean that rural children absolutely deny urban children, because whether in urban or rural areas, the appearance performance used to measure intelligence, such as academic performance or professional ability, depends on their own efforts. 4, sublimation+deduction, urban children are not proud, rural children are not inferior, everyone * * * Qi Xin works together to help each other really help social development, really smart.

Of course, the above is written by my hostile teacher, so please adopt it if you are not afraid of digression!