The title of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, with complete structure and fluent language. Even the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, there are not many serious grammar or spelling mistakes.
The author tried to learn from Jack? Look for the connection between the writer and someone in London life. From the content point of view, the author has a better understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials, but only limited to the list of materials. How to draw your own conclusion by analyzing the materials is the purpose of this paper, and it is at this point that the author's efforts are not enough.
Extended data
Precautions:
1, the abstract of the paper should exclude the content that has become common sense in this subject field; Never write what should appear in the introduction into the abstract; Generally don't interpret and comment on the content of the paper (especially self-evaluation).
2. Don't simply repeat the information already in the title.
3. Rigorous structure, concise expression and exact semantics. What to write first, then what to write, should be arranged in logical order. Sentences should be coherent and echo each other. Use long sentences with caution and keep them as simple as possible. Every sentence should be clear, and there should be no vague, general or vague words, but the abstract is a complete essay after all, and telegraph writing is not enough. The abstract is not segmented.