I think this is a very bad situation. Although a doctor says that publishing a paper is a testimony of his ability and his progress on the medical road, the most important thing is to save lives, whether the doctor publishes a paper or goes out for further study, isn't it just to better bring advanced technology to patients? Then the clinic is the most important thing. The knowledge in many textbooks is not as good as that in clinic, and new discoveries may be made in clinic. I think clinic is definitely higher than scientific research and everything else.

In fact, this is also a contradiction in modern society. Whether it is reality or pursuing a better road, it is a reality. Clinically, you can gain more practical experience by contacting more patients, but it is possible to learn to do experiments, scientific research and research, and it is also possible for your neighbors to receive both, because if your paper is published and helpful to others, your reputation may be improved, and someone will ask you to cooperate in advertising and so on.

For people whose material life is already very rich, they may prefer realistic things, because they can come into contact with all kinds of patients in clinic, and they want to save lives by being doctors. Therefore, more clinical experience can bring hope to more patients, which is the best way for them to gain a sense of self-worth. If they want to improve their material life, they may be more inclined to publish some international papers, which will give him an advantage in his professional title and salary.

But I still feel that it is the fundamental duty of doctors to treat patients intimately, regardless of the current material life. Doctors themselves are lifesavers, and they can't leave patients hanging there or take a casual look for their own benefit. In this case, the clinic is meaningless.