Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What are the disadvantages of the hot working method in the revised paper?
What are the disadvantages of the hot working method in the revised paper?
This method must be based on the mature conception of the first draft and the good foundation of the paper. Otherwise, due to time constraints, all aspects lack further in-depth thinking and consideration, and the revision is easily limited to minor repairs and cannot be substantially revised.

Related information:

1, hot working

Hot working method is to complete the first draft while the iron is hot, and to supplement or correct the omissions or mistakes in the writing process in time when the thinking is clear, the brain is active and the mind is still immersed in the context of the paper. However, this method must be based on the mature conception of the first draft and the good foundation of the paper.

Otherwise, due to time constraints, all aspects lack further in-depth thinking and consideration, and the revision is easily limited to minor repairs and cannot be substantially revised.

Step 2: Cold treatment

After completing the first draft, consciously let the paper cool for a period of time before revising it. It is easy to overcome the inertia of the original thinking activities, jump out of the limitations of the original thinking, and examine and evaluate your own papers more objectively and calmly from a new angle, so it is easy to find omissions in the first draft.

Moreover, cold treatment and revision can also make everyone think about the paper from the perspective of "readers" and often have new views, so as to revise the paper more comprehensively and completely.

Asking for advice This is a review method of asking for advice with an open mind and brainstorming. After the paper is written, take your first draft to experts, teachers, colleagues and classmates for advice, and then refer to their opinions on the first draft for revision.

There must be a teacher in a threesome. My own understanding is always limited. Listening to other people's opinions will greatly improve the quality of revision. Listen to anyone with an open mind. The so-called bystander is clear. Because others have certain differences in life experiences, cultural backgrounds, ways of thinking and academic viewpoints, we often look at them from a new perspective, and it is easy to find problems that we can't see and problems that we are unaware of.