(1) proof (argument)

Proof refers to actively stating your own point of view and explaining that it is correct, thus establishing an argument. Proof is also called "argument".

L, for example: it is an argument method based on real examples. Narrative discussion is to use "narration" to express factual materials and put forward arguments "discussion" to comment and prove one's own views.

2. Analysis: It is a method to demonstrate by analyzing problems. The author is required to analyze problems and things, reveal the causal relationship between arguments and arguments, thus proving the correctness of opinions and establishing arguments.

3. Citation: an argument method that quotes classic quotations or scientific axioms and common sense to prove an argument. It should be noted that the quoted remarks and events must stand the test and be objective and true. Also be careful not to quote too much.

4. Contrast: It is also an example method. The difference between it and the general example method is that besides examples, it should be compared with examples to highlight the essence of things and establish arguments. The advantage of this method is that it is easy to open people's minds and broaden their horizons in comparison. It contains more contents than the general argument, so the reason is more thorough.

5. Analogy: This is a method to prove the argument by analogy, and it is an intuitive demonstration method. When demonstrating, you can tell stories, make metaphors and quote idioms and allusions to illustrate abstract truth.

② rebation.

This is a reduction to absurdity, and the author tries to prove that the other party's argument is wrong through discussion, so as to refute the other party and establish his own correct argument. There are three ways to refute:

1, refuting the other side's argument. That is to say, directly refute the mistakes of the other party's argument. The specific writing is:

Prove the other side's argument wrong with facts. This is the application of case method in refutation. But the right here is not proved by facts, but by mistakes.

(2) analysis and demonstration of errors and hazards.

(3) Extend the other side's argument and expose its fallacy.

(4) Establish new opposing arguments to refute each other's arguments.

2. refute each other's arguments. Wrong arguments are sometimes based on false and wrong arguments; Have a plenty of fabricated facts and reasons. From refuting these arguments, the other side's argument will be refuted and its argument will not be established.

3. refute each other's arguments. Wrong arguments, arguments that serve them, and their argumentation process. Once the logical reasoning errors in the other party's argument are exposed, its argument will be broken. This is the method of "attacking the shield with the spear of the child" References:

/rdfzfiles/HiSchool/h 200492 1 164038 . shtml