What is the conclusion of "getting more help from Tao, but not from Tao"?
On the central argument of "getting more help from the Tao, getting less help from the Tao" 1. According to the current teaching reference books compiled by People's Education Society, tell students that the central argument of this article is that "the weather is not as good as the right place, and the right place is not as good as harmony with people". This is also my own opinion. What is the central argument? The central argument is the viewpoint, proposition and opinion put forward by the author in the article. Then use arguments and argumentation methods to prove it. The first sentence at the beginning of this paper puts forward the viewpoint: "The weather is not as good as the geographical position, and the geographical position is not as good as the harmony between people." It is pointed out that "harmony between people" is the first condition to defeat the enemy. Then, by citing war examples, it is proved that only "harmony between people" is the most important condition to determine the outcome of the war by the fact that neither the people who occupy time nor the people who occupy land have won the war. The article then carries out theoretical argumentation, and through analysis and reasoning, draws the conclusion that "more help is gained, less help is lost", which is very common in the syllogism argumentation structure of "asking questions, analyzing problems and solving problems". The "asking questions" in this paper can be regarded as the author's point of view. 2. It is not contradictory to say that "getting more help from the Tao, getting less help from the Tao" is the central argument of this article, while "the weather is not as good as the right place, and the right place is not as good as people's harmony" is the central argument of this article, and the two views are consistent. Because "Tao" will win people's hearts, "human harmony" will be realized, and Mencius' thought of "benevolent government" will be realized. "Tao" and "human harmony" stand for the same meaning, both of which are aimed at realizing "benevolent government", so it is not wrong to say that "Tao helps more and Tao helps less", but it is just another expression of the same meaning. During the examination, students will get the same score if they put forward the central argument in either sentence. The answer of liberal arts can't be a standard answer, just a reference answer. The two sentences are different, but they have the same meaning, so they are both right and should be given points. 4. Teachers should have their own opinions, no matter which opinions they agree with, they should give their own reasons, but don't let students fall into unnecessary arguments. It is suggested that when students answer questions, they should take the current statement in the teaching reference of People's Education Society as the final conclusion, that is, the central argument of this paper is that "the weather is not as good as the geographical position, and the geographical position is not as good as the harmony between people".