Citation and plagiarism are two different concepts. Literally speaking, quoting is to borrow other people's writing theories to express their views, while plagiarism is different. Plagiarism is to move other people's words intact into their own articles as their own views. Naturally, this is only a literal understanding. The biggest difference is that the format is different, and references need to use reference symbols.

At present, many schools have certain restrictions on the citation of papers. It is impossible to say that the whole article is a quotation, starting with a quotation and ending with a quotation. Such a paper is naturally unqualified, not quoted, but copied. Under normal circumstances, the citation of school papers is also calculated by sentence, and too many citations are not allowed. Too many citations will be judged as plagiarism.

Therefore, the duplicate checking rate of the paper is guaranteed to be within a reasonable range, and too many citations or improper use of format symbols may be considered plagiarism.

The fact is, no matter how strict the line you set, as long as the line is thick, that's their room to play. No matter how clear this line is, for some people, it is just taking advantage of the difference in difficulty. They should study "the realm of plagiarism", sum up experiences and lessons, and exploit loopholes in the rules. If you want to play something ambiguous, for example, half the article is enclosed in quotation marks. ...

Don't blame others, ask yourself first, is this how you write articles? Why walk a tightrope when you have nothing to do? After you finish writing your paper, you can go to the HowNet Paper Check Network in advance to test the HowNet paper.