1, the full score of the paper is 75, and the score is divided into three grades: excellent, passing and failing:

(1)60 -75 is excellent (equivalent to 80-100 on a scale of100).

(2) Pass 45-59 points (equivalent to 60-79 points on the scale of 100).

(3) A score of 0 to 44 is considered as failing (equivalent to 0-59 out of 100).

2. When grading, we will grade according to the following five aspects:

(1) conforms to the meaning of the topic (30%), which is divided into three grades: very consistent, good consistent and basically consistent. Note: whether it is a technical paper, a theoretical paper or a practical paper, it needs to be discussed according to one or more aspects of the answer.

(2) The application depth and level (20%) can be divided into four levels: strong, strong, average and poor independent working ability.

(3) Practice (20%) can be divided into four grades: there are a lot of practice and in-depth professional level and experience; Good practical and personal experience and understanding; Have general, practical and basically suitable experience; Have preliminary practice and superficial experience.

(4) The expressive ability (15%) is divided into three grades according to whether the logic is clear, the expression is rigorous, the words are fluent and the organization is clear.

(5) Comprehensive ability and analytical ability (15%) can be divided into three grades: very strong, relatively strong and average.

3, the following papers, need appropriate points (5- 10):

(1) The abstract should be controlled within the range of 200-400 words. Any paper that has not written an abstract or the abstract is too short and has no substantive content.

(2) There are a lot of scrawled and illegible papers.

(3) The text is basically just a narrative article listed one by one.

(4) It is indeed an overly boastful, boastful and exaggerated paper.

(5) If there are obvious errors and loopholes in the content, each category of similar errors will be deducted 1 point.

(6) Papers with relatively low practical application background.

4. In any of the following circumstances, the test paper cannot be given a passing score:

(1) A paper with fictional plot and seriously untrue or unreliable content.

(2) Papers that fail to discuss the practical experience of project development in detail mainly come from book knowledge and excerpts from data.

(3) The contents and methods discussed are too old, or the level of the project is relatively inefficient. For example, database design only discusses Foxpro, with no distinctive features; Development is a stand-alone version (isolated), small-scale and featureless application project.

(4) the content is irrelevant, or the content is relatively empty, which is basically a general statement without in-depth understanding.

(5) The length of the text and abstract is too short (for example, the text is less than 1200 words).

(6) Papers with poor arts and sciences have many typos, unclear organizational ideas and too scrawled handwriting.

5, the following circumstances, can consider appropriate points (5- 10):

(1) Outstanding papers with original opinions or profound experiences.

(2) papers with high viewpoints, which truly conform to the new trends and trends of computer application system development and can be initially realized.

(3) Excellent papers with informative content, pertinent experience and clear thinking are very practical.

(4) the project is very difficult, or the quality of the project is excellent, or the project involves major topics and can be correctly discussed according to the requirements of the test questions.