The beginning is the question, which is the argument part. There should be two meanings. First, make a brief introduction to the object of analysis (that is, this work): what's its name (title), who is the author (filmed by that station), what genre (column) it belongs to, what to say, what theme to express, etc. The second is to make an overall evaluation of this work, that is, to put forward the central argument of the whole paper, such as "this film is very successful" and so on.
The middle is the subject, which is the part of questioning and argumentation. It is necessary to analyze the success of this film and what creative experience it has. It is suggested to talk about at least three aspects (or characteristics) of posts and telecommunications, write a short paragraph in each aspect and extract a comment (that is, a small argument) in each aspect. Small arguments should be incisive, neat and eye-catching, and the best summary sentences should be neat. In order to highlight small points, it should be placed at the beginning of each small paragraph, or changed into a thick inscription layout, or saved as a subtitle. You can also add "first, second, third" or "first, second, third" or use parallelism. After that, I made an analysis around this little argument, "put facts and be reasonable." It is necessary to combine the content of the film, give specific examples, describe the discussion, and analyze the expression effect while describing the relevant plot or shot to prove the correctness of your point of view. There are two tendencies to be prevented here. First, the simple narrative content has become storytelling. Second, it's just talk, or empty lyricism, without combining specific content, completely out of touch with the work, air to air, that won't do either. Please note that this part is the main body of the article and determines the level of the article. The length should represent most of the full text, and it will not work if it is short.
Finally, the conclusion is the method to solve the problem, which is the conclusion part. This part is very short, mainly to summarize the full text, or point out its shortcomings, or raise hopes, or supplement explanations, or take care of the beginning. With this part, the article has a beginning and an end, intact, forming a climax, leaving a deep impression.
This is the usual way to write a paper, and you can certainly master it flexibly. Don't take the "frame" as a "frame" and bind your thinking. But as far as middle school students are concerned, this format is generally more suitable. It is suggested to write a paragraph outline first, at least think about which layers of meaning to say, and then write paragraph by paragraph according to the outline. In this way, the framework of the paper is very stable, and you can make large paragraphs clear, with clear levels and prominent small arguments. (format)
Content is the content of the film, from the film's director, starring role, plot, narrative rhythm, character setting, these are all aspects of big imagination, as well as lens pictures, such as lighting, lens movement, scene scheduling, color tone, soundtrack, lines and so on. You don't have to cover all these, you should choose several key points according to the characteristics of the film.
take for example