1. Stiffness: The submission of papers by Beijing Institute of Audit is very strict, which requires the authors to have certain academic value and innovation, and at the same time meet the positioning and requirements of the journal.
2. Professionalism: The reviewers of BNC are usually experts and scholars in various fields. They have high requirements for the professionalism and academic level of the manuscript, and can conduct in-depth examination of the manuscript from a professional perspective.
3. Fairness: BNC's review process is open and fair, and all review opinions and results will be fed back to the author to ensure the transparency of the review process.
4. Rigidity: Norinco's audit process is rigorous, usually including preliminary examination, expert review, editing and other links, and each link has strict standards and requirements.
5. Timeliness: CNNC pays attention to the timeliness of manuscript review, and generally completes the manuscript review within a certain period of time after receiving the manuscript, and feeds back the review results to the author.
6. Interaction: In the process of peer review, there is good interaction between the author and the reviewer, and the author can modify and improve the manuscript according to the peer review opinions to improve the quality of the manuscript.
7. Humanization: Although the review process of Beixin is strict, the editorial department will also consider the author's actual situation and give a certain grace period in case of special circumstances.
Generally speaking, the review process of Beixin aims to ensure the academic level and quality of the journal, while respecting and protecting the rights and interests of the authors, which embodies the principles of fairness, justice and openness.