When I was young, I felt that this application was false and empty, and it was a new eight-part essay praising a party. If there is a universal eight-part essay, it will spread all over the world. But now that I think about it, I was so naive. If you really hold this view, you must apply for loser.
Today's applications are more than simply listing problems and solving them. It is an exam that really tests a person's ability to discover, analyze and solve problems.
A friend of mine is the "penholder" of the government functional departments. He writes essays that are fluent, easy to understand, and rigorous in logic without losing orthodoxy and atmosphere. It was also after N years of training that he got this magical power.
The current applications are all about social hot issues, such as culture, education, environmental protection and so on.
The theory of provincial examination and application is generally three questions. The first question is to summarize the problems in the whole article or a certain paragraph of material, the second question is the solution of a certain paragraph of material, and the third question is "big composition", which combines materials but does not stick to materials to write articles.
Many people write well, but it doesn't necessarily affect the application. As an official document, Shen Lun should pay attention to a logic, a cultural connotation and a normative model.
Rack one's brains to give an example, but I really don't know where to start.
Briefly tell me about my application.
First, it is enough to buy a set of painted application papers and a set of prediction papers. Because it covers almost all hot issues.
Look at these papers and answers. Although they can't be directly used in exams, they can affect the style of writing and sense of language more or less. Reading more, copying more and familiarizing with reading are still effective for the cultivation of language standardization and conciseness.
Some people say they want to read People's Daily, Half-monthly Talk and Seeking Truth. I don't object, but I didn't read it myself. Whether I watch Southern Weekend all the year round or not, it seems that the Southern Department is sharper and the analysis of the problems in the "big composition" will be more profound when writing a composition.
I will copy down the sentences I can't write in the answers to the graffiti paper and read them carefully. If I can recite better, I am lazy. I always read books. Look at the article in the answer again and analyze why it is arranged like this. What logic is this? When I watch more, I will have a general feeling.
Second, as mentioned above, reading more and copying more is just the beginning, which will lead to the phenomenon of being superior. I will make an application every three or four days, and then analyze my own shortcomings according to the standard answers.
Yes, I'm not saying that people's answers are so good, but I must write more applications like loser, compare my own shortcomings and learn from others to improve myself!
I will analyze the answers after writing the application, and then read my article again in three or four days. Then I will lament how illustrated the article is when I write it, and then I will make some changes to the article myself.
By doing so, at least the application level can be greatly improved.
Third, for the first and second questions in the application, you can basically "copy the original text", but you should also summarize and pay attention to the logical order, so that the first two questions are often safer and you can get a basic score.
A "big composition" is usually about 1000 words. My personal composition is usually written in four paragraphs. The first paragraph is what kind of social phenomenon there is and what kind of social problems this phenomenon has caused. Of course it's a problem, not for you to sing a hymn! The second paragraph is the cause of the problem. Nothing more than economic reasons, cultural reasons, public awareness reasons, government reasons, it is best to analyze the reasons, not too procrastinating. The third paragraph is based on the reasons analyzed in the previous paragraph, and explains how you can solve these problems for each reason. The fourth stage is sublimation, just fine.
Of the four paragraphs, the most important one must be the third paragraph. Although the omnipotent eight articles are already bad things in the streets, there are still places to choose from.
For example:
For example, the causes of the problem include government inaction. Then the solution must be that the government should perform its functions well. I have written before that the government should formulate corresponding policies for a certain problem and earnestly perform government functions. Now let me write: the government should give full play to its subjective initiative, organize relevant personnel to go deep into the masses to investigate the root cause of a problem, organize experts to demonstrate the results of the investigation, listen to the opinions of the masses, and formulate corresponding laws and policies after fully considering the opinions of all parties. Effectively implement laws, regulations and policies, and communicate with the masses in time through the feedback mechanism. (That's probably what it means. Specific questions will be written in more detail, not so general. ) in the final analysis, it is meaningful, don't pretend to be empty.