1. Topic relevance: Reviewers need to determine whether the topic of the paper is related to the focus of the journal and the interests of readers. If the theme of the paper is inconsistent with the theme of the journal, then the paper may not be suitable for publication in the journal.
2. Research methods: Reviewers need to evaluate whether the research methods of the paper are scientific and rigorous. If there is something wrong with the research method, the results of the paper may be unreliable, so it is not suitable for publication.
3. Innovation: Reviewers need to evaluate whether the paper is innovative. If the paper only repeats the existing research, its importance is relatively low.
4. Results and conclusions: Reviewers need to evaluate whether the results and conclusions of the paper are clear and accurate. If the results and conclusions are vague or inconsistent with the research methods and data, the value of this paper may be greatly reduced.
5. Readability: Reviewers also need to evaluate the readability of the paper. If the language of the paper is difficult to understand or the structure is chaotic, then readers may not be able to get valuable information from it.
6. Literature citation: Reviewers will look at the literature cited in the paper to assess the author's understanding of the field and whether their research is based on a solid theoretical foundation.
7. Contribution to academia: The reviewers will also consider the contribution of the paper to academia. This may include new theories, methods, discoveries, or deepening and expanding existing knowledge.
Generally speaking, reviewers need to evaluate the appropriateness and importance of papers from multiple angles to ensure that they can provide valuable information to readers and meet the standards and requirements of journals.