Here are some things I found for you:
How to evaluate the quality of a composition?
1, ① chronological articles must have a theme, a positive and healthy theme, and try to reflect the reality.
(2) Narration must serve the theme and be fluent.
③ If multiple events can be narrated side by side to serve a certain theme, then the events should be narrated in a certain order. -the basic standard of a good note composition.
2. A successful work must have a proper theme, and the created characters should be representative and skillfully use various methods to depict characters.
3. A successful landscape composition should be deeply immersed in the reader's reading; The article should show the picture described in many aspects, combine dynamic and static, and give people beautiful enjoyment.
4, excellent writing situational composition, always have a little face, point and face combination, highlight the key points, write the atmosphere; Hierarchical and orderly.
5, ① To evaluate an essay, we must first understand the characteristics of prose, that is, "the form is scattered but the spirit is not scattered", that is to say, the freedom of form is unrestricted, but the center of the article is clear.
② Prose can be divided into narrative prose and lyric prose. A, if you encounter a narrative, it depends on whether it reflects the real social life or expresses the author's sense of shame. B, if you encounter lyricism, it depends on whether it expresses the author's feelings and wishes about real life and whether it can impress the readers.
③ Pay attention to the expression of prose. A successful essay should be able to express emotion by taking advantage of the scenery, raising things to express emotion or expressing one's mind directly.
The language must be concise, concise and vivid, with short sentences as the mainstay, instead of long sentences, and more metaphors, antithesis and contrast.
6.① A good expository article can make readers deeply understand all aspects of the explained things after reading it.
② Explanatory methods should be used more in explanatory texts.
③ The language of expository writing must be accurate, concise, popular and vivid.
7. Argumentative writing is an article that focuses on discussion and reasoning. The article should reflect the author's propaganda views, criticize or refute some words and deeds, explain the truth, and achieve the purpose of persuading others. If readers still have questions and are still dissatisfied with the author's point of view after reading it, then this article is not successful enough.
(2) Argument writing should have arguments, arguments and arguments. First, the arguments should be clear and practical. B, the argument should be realistic and can serve the argument. C, demonstration methods should be multi-purpose, in order to achieve the role of serving the demonstration.
8.① A novel should have a complete story. Environmental description shapes typical characters, and images reflect social life.
Novels should be as concise as possible. It is necessary to express the theme around a central idea, what to praise, what to praise, what to oppose and what to criticize, with a clear-cut stand and unambiguous right and wrong.
9. The language of successful poems is concise, beautiful and vivid. Besides rhyming, readers should have room for imagination, and poetry should also have strong lyricism.
Question 2: How to appreciate the article 1. Look at the topic of the article. What does it mean to have a clear theme and correct thinking?
Second, look at the content of the article. It should be clearly stated that things are smooth, the plot is touching, convincing and infectious.
Third, look at the characteristics of article writing. Such as: emotions in the scene, exaggerated words, delicate feelings, story flashbacks and so on.
In addition, the appreciation of the article should start with the thoughts and feelings that the author wants to express. Appreciation is analysis and appreciation. We should grasp the sentences that can reflect the author's feelings and pick out the typical ones to analyze. In other words, every sentence you analyze must come from the original text, and it is a conclusion drawn from the original text. After appreciation, it is to sublimate the theme of the article after analysis, because the articles given on the examination paper are basically from the hands of famous people, so it is good to beautify and improve them. If you write an appreciation of ordinary articles, you can also write down shortcomings and mistakes.
First, appreciate the characteristics of language
1, the language of this article is vivid, beautiful, cordial and natural, full of elegant scholarly spirit, especially rhetorical devices such as metaphor and personification, which vividly shows us a picture of ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
2. The sentence patterns in this paper are flexible, such as long sentences, short sentences, parallelism sentences, antithesis sentences and rhetorical questions. They are vivid, colorful, rhythmic and expressive, which makes people tired of reading and memorable.
In this paper, what I want to say is that
4. Feelings ... This article is profound, meaningful and touching. Readers are moved by this sincere and strong feeling. Only in this way can they understand the author's feelings ... and * * *.
The language of this article is full of exaggeration and satire, especially the words of ...
6. The language of this article is very philosophical, especially a few sentences about …, which tell us something about …, make us understand the truth of … after reading it, and inspire us to think deeply about the problem of …, which is very beneficial.
Second, appreciation of writing skills.
1, See the big from the small: This paper starts with the familiar … and grasps the characteristics of …, so that we can understand the profound truth of life from ordinary trivial matters. (or reflect the lofty ideological realm from ordinary things; Or show a good spiritual quality from ordinary little things. ) such as whistles, sails and fireflies.
2. Contrast: This paper skillfully presents … and … to readers, so that readers can naturally feel the changes (or advantages and disadvantages) of … from the comparison, so as to clearly show … such as "Fan Jinzhong Residence".
3. Symbolism: This paper uses symbolic writing techniques to grasp the similar characteristics between … and …, and through the accurate description of …, it better achieves the purpose of expressing …. For example, Praise of Poplar.
4. Coincidence: This article skillfully uses coincidence ..., which is not only unexpected to readers, but also reasonable in life, and shows the theme well, making people nod and praise after reading it. For example, The Gift of Maggie.
5, cadence: This article uses cadence method, the author's original intention is …, first of all …, so that readers have a more comprehensive and profound understanding of …, thus making the expressed object more full and vivid. For example, Praise of Poplar.
6. Film pasting: This paper uses the method of film pasting, taking Praise of Poplar as an example.
7. Contrast: This paper uses a lot of environmental contrast to show the psychology of objects. In the ... environment, it better shows the inner world of the characters and enhances the expressive force of the article. For example, a lonely trip
8. Consignment to express meaning: This paper skillfully uses the writing method of entrustment to express meaning. The author firmly grasps the characteristics of ..., for example, Ailian said.
9. Pawn Zhang Xianzhi: This paper uses the writing technique of Pawn Zhang Xianzhi to tell the story layer by layer, until the end, it suddenly dawns, … makes people realize, and then turns to deep thinking.
10, suspense: This paper skillfully uses suspense writing techniques, first throwing ... to the readers without explaining the reasons, and asking questions layer by layer, so as to firmly grasp the readers' interest in reading ... >>
Question 3: How to learn to write critical articles? First, briefly describe the content of the article;
Secondly, talk about feelings (you can talk about the author's intention, or what inspiration, or comment on a detail, or express your views on people or things).
You can praise, criticize and ask questions.
People who can write good articles must have their own ideological system. I think we should first "find" an ideological possession for ourselves, which is a kind of belief in layman's terms. Whether it is the essence of China's traditional culture, modernism introduced from the West after the May 4th Movement, or even the so-called post-modernism, etc. Choose one or one of them as the ideological pillar of your writing, so that you will form your own independent ideological system. For example, Xu Bulao clearly stated that his "research achievement" was that "bureaucracy is the head of all evils", although I could not agree with it, and even "quite disapproved". But it is under the control of this ideological construction that I have written many powerful articles, which have achieved the effect of "stabbing greed and stabbing abuse" and formed my own style on this basis. If you have your own ideological pursuit, you will stand firm, will not be confused by some superficial phenomena, and will not blindly follow the trend and repeat other people's views. Especially for young intellectuals whose values have not yet been fully formed, this is not only the basis for writing articles, but also the ideological basis for cultivating their independent cultural personality. I want to say a few more words, that is, for criticism or prose creation, "exposing ugliness" is its life, and only judgment can develop. Therefore, most essays have inherited Lu Xun's way. Carrying forward Lu Xun's spirit is not blindly imitating Lu Xun's writing techniques, and others can't learn his essay writing. What we want to learn is his thought and spirit. As a model of independent cultural personality of modern intellectuals in China, Lu Xun is a writer, but he is also a thinker.
As far as specific creation is concerned, the accumulation and selection of materials is very important. I believe that everyone has a deep understanding, and I don't need to say anything more. Expressing one's views on specific events or people is the main line of the article, and how to expand a face or even a person from a point is the most important issue in some comments. From phenomenon to essence, writing should be logical, so as to tell readers what the article wants to express. Although some purely critical articles are boring to read, they are very powerful and can see the author's real works. Nowadays, many comments, whether on paper or online, reveal problems that people can see, and they are really profound, not many, so there is a lot of text garbage to repeat ideas that have been repeated many times.
It must be clear that comments are not a tool for the author to vent his feelings. In many review articles, we can find a strong "lyric hero" image. This common fault was first discovered when I was writing. The authors of such articles are easy to write, and they feel very enjoyable, and readers are also very enjoyable to read, but this is only a superficial phenomenon. It is not the author's anger that really pushes the article to a high level. We don't deny that the article needs emotion, but this emotion must jump out of the author's subjective emotion and express an objective fact. Mr. Lu Xun once said that his essays need to be edited and revised three or four times after they are published in newspapers and periodicals, but we still read them with such good taste. I'm afraid some of today's essays will become water once. I think, writing such an article, we only have our own temporary "elegant curse" aphrodisiac. Because of its existence, the article is crowned with a profound, humorous and spicy aura, but in essence, it is just a smug psychosexuality of impotence patients. In this regard, the slogan "It is better to write at your desk than to complain in vain" is wrong in itself.
Some people say that the current essays are in line with the current comments. If we really want to divide them into two minority styles, then I think they can learn from each other. A good review should be a combination of rational thinking and perceptual thinking. This combination must be reasonable, and too much emphasis on any one aspect will weaken the appeal of the article. Every author has his own style, and these different styles all show the same taste, which is one of the great charms of criticism. This charm is the life-saving force of criticism in literary ontology.
Writing innovation seems to be a resounding slogan recently, and it is also the author's choice in the current situation of a large amount of text garbage. Essay >>
Question 4: How to comment on other people's articles and point out your own views and suggestions on other people's articles is actually not an easy task. Because commenting on other people's articles requires not only good appreciation ability, but also good language expression ability. Commenting on other people's articles in our blog is also a good way to meet more friends and enhance popularity. Comments are emotional and often touching in the natural expression of true feelings. Let's take a look at Yu Zhe's evaluation of Huang Xiao's "School Leaving Ceremony": the anthropomorphic sentences in the text make the whole exercise very vivid, and the last sentence in the penultimate paragraph adds a lot of color to this excellent work, and the environmental description also makes me full of praise! Huang Xiao, good job! Xiaoyu ~ Let's reminisce about the parents' recommendation in a good article ―― A word to parents in 06/kloc-0 《 Reflection on a mother's education 》 Huang Xiao's mother 2010-02-0319:14: 02 I often stare at my son's childhood. At that time, on that day, my son and I could live in heaven almost every day! At that time, on that day, I would be extremely excited because of my son's milk-sounding language and Aibo's behavior, and my son would advance by leaps and bounds because of my silly smile and exaggerated praise. . . . . . Children of the same sex and age make us more sympathetic and understand each other. Thanks again. Tang Yidan's mother: Daughter, let's work together to make you happy to study and grow up! Qiu Jian's mother: I also read such a touching educational article with tears in my eyes. I think, as a mother, I have paid a lot, but I feel more guilty about my children. Sorry, my dear child, I want to be a good mother. My mother 2010-02-0323: 44:10 Thank you, Miss Huang and my mother Guo. After reading this article, I remembered that I scolded my daughter a few days ago because she didn't do well in the exam It seems that if you want to make your child excellent, you have to start from yourself. I decided to buy one tomorrow >
Question 5: How to comment on the article? Look at the topic first, see if the article is off topic, then read it carefully, see if the sentences in the article are fluent, whether there are typos or punctuation marks, then see if the sentences in the article are beautiful, and finally see if the article echoes from beginning to end, or draw circles in other ways.
You have to recite the important things yourself.
This is accumulated over time.
In order to improve, of course, you should also understand the characteristics and precautions of various styles in order to make better comments.
Question 6: How to evaluate the ideological content of the article and the author's viewpoint and attitude means to make an appropriate evaluation of the ideological content of the article and the author's viewpoint and attitude on the basis of correct understanding and grasp.
Compared with identifying and screening the important information in the article, analyzing and summarizing the main points and central ideas of the article, analyzing the structural level and expression form of the article, and analyzing and summarizing the reading requirements of the author's views and attitudes in the article, the biggest feature of the evaluation of the test center is the subjective evaluation of the "existing things" in the article. The conclusion is not inherent in the original text, but something added subjectively by the reader. Other requirements of modern text reading are to understand, select, analyze and synthesize the "existing" things in the article, and draw objective conclusions. Therefore, "evaluation" has broken through the simple understanding of the meaning and content of words and entered the highest realm of reading ability. It needs the individual participation of readers more than other abilities and is more subjective. Candidates' critical thinking ability and creative ability have also been more fully demonstrated here.
"Evaluation" is based on in-depth reading, and its ultimate goal is to apply what you have learned. Through rational thinking and aesthetic judgment, we have a deep feeling and understanding of pros and cons, right and wrong, thus enhancing the awareness of evaluation and improving the level of appreciation.
The content of evaluation thought is accurate (extreme), profound (superficial), comprehensive (one-sided) and objective (hypothetical).
Evaluate the author's views and attitudes.
Analysis and understanding are the premise and foundation of evaluation, and evaluation is to comment at a higher level. Therefore, we should pay attention to:
Specific analysis.
Both analysis and evaluation must be closely combined with the reality of literary works to avoid rambling analysis without the works, or infinitely exaggerating some guesses and unconfirmed materials.
An objective evaluation.
We should give an objective and fair evaluation of the ideological content and the writer's attitude expressed in the works, that is, we should analyze and evaluate the works with correct thinking as the theoretical basis, dialectical method as the basic analytical method, and the unique artistic laws of literary works, rather than arbitrarily commenting on personal likes and dislikes. In the concrete evaluation, social background, the writer's life thought and the actual creation of his works are all important factors that must be considered.
Historical evaluation.
The analysis and evaluation of classical literary works and foreign literary works should proceed from the reality of social history, rather than forcing the ancients and foreign writers with today's point of view.
Question 7: I want to comment on a good article. How come? You can comment from many aspects and angles.
Available from.
language
Character image
Artistic feature
affect
Isometric analysis.
You can refer to literary criticism.
Satisfied and looking forward to being adopted