Literature review is a style different from research papers, which is composed of understanding, sorting, comprehensive analysis and evaluation after researchers read the literature on a certain topic in advance.

Second, the writing requirements of literature review

(A), the format of literature review

The format of literature review is different from that of general research papers. This is because the research papers focus on the research methods and results, while the literature review introduces the detailed information, trends, progress, prospects and comments related to the theme. Therefore, the format of literature review is relatively diverse, but generally speaking, it includes the following four parts: preface, theme, summary and references. When writing a literature review, you can write an outline according to these four parts, and then write according to the outline.

The preface should use concise words to explain the purpose and necessity of writing, the definition of related concepts, the scope of review, the present situation and trend of related issues, and the focus of current major issues. The preface is generally 200-300 words, not more than 500 words.

Writing is the focus of review, and writing has no fixed format. As long as the comprehensive content can be better expressed, the author can creatively adopt various forms. The text mainly includes two parts: argumentation and argumentation. By asking questions, analyzing and solving problems, this paper compares different scholars' views on the same problem and its theoretical basis-daxue.chazidian.com, and further expounds the ins and outs of the problem and the author's own views. Of course, the author can also put forward different views from the historical background, present situation and development direction of the problem. The body part can be divided into several subheadings according to the content.

Abstract is a brief summary of the main body of the abstract. The author should make a comprehensive evaluation of various viewpoints, put forward his own views, and point out the existing problems and the direction and prospect of future development. A simple summary can also be omitted.

References are an important part of the review. The number of general references can reflect the breadth and depth of the author's reading. Different magazines have different requirements on the number of references for review papers, generally less than 30 articles are appropriate, with the latest documents in the last 3-5 years as the main ones.

(2), literature review regulations

1. In order to make the topic report have sufficient basis, master students are required to make a literature review before opening the topic.

2. In the literature review, graduate students should systematically consult the domestic and foreign literature related to their own research direction. Read at least 30 articles at ordinary times, and collect documents objectively and comprehensively.

3. In the literature review, graduate students should explain the development history of their research direction, the main research achievements of predecessors, existing problems and development trends.

4. Literature review should be clear and concise.

5. Use data appropriately and reasonably. The document quotation is enclosed in square brackets [] and placed in the upper right corner of the quotation.

6. I have my own opinions and opinions on literature review. You can't confuse the author's views with the literature. Encourage graduate students to find more problems, ask more questions, and point out possible ways to analyze and solve problems, which is highly targeted.

7. Literature review shall be no less than 3,000 words.

(3), matters needing attention

Literature should be collected as completely as possible. Mastering a large number of comprehensive documents is the premise of writing a good summary, otherwise it is impossible to write a summary by collecting a little information casually.

⒉

Pay attention to the representativeness, reliability and scientificity of the cited documents. There may be similar views in the collected documents, and the reliability and scientificity of some documents are not the same, so we should pay attention to choosing representative, reliable and scientific documents when quoting documents.

⒊

The reference file should be faithful to the content of the file. Because the literature review has the author's own comments and analysis, it is necessary to distinguish the author's point of view from the content of the literature when writing, and not to tamper with the content of the literature. There are not many references. Literature review writers sometimes see the phenomenon of quoting indirect literature. If the author quotes other people's references, it is better not to quote them indirectly.

⒋

References cannot be omitted. Some scientific research papers can omit references, but the literature review must not be omitted, and it should be the literature cited in the paper, which can reflect the whole theme and the author can read it directly.

5. Don't make a long summary. Magazine editorial departments generally have a certain number of words to review manuscripts. When the author writes a summary for the first time, he often doesn't pay attention to this point, which leads to more empty talk and cliché s, and the focus is not prominent. The summary should generally not exceed 4000 words.

Summary is not a simple literature list, but must be summarized by the author himself. Some comments just list the literature, which looks like a running account, without the author's own synthesis and analysis, which makes people feel repetitive and puzzling after reading, and the materials and comments are in harmony.

Three, the description format of academic papers and references

1. Monograph: [serial number] author. Title [M]. Version (1 version is not recorded). Place of publication: the year of publication by the publisher. Start and end page numbers.

2. Journal: [serial number] author. Title [J] Name of annual volume (issue) of publication: page number.

3. Conference proceedings (or compilation): [serial number] author, title [A], editor, title of proceedings [C], place of publication: publishing year, starting and ending pages.

4. Dissertation: [serial number] author. Title [D] Address of degree conferring: degree conferring unit and year.

5. Patent: [serial number] Patent applicant. Patent name [P]. Patent country (or region): date of publication of patent number.

6. Scientific report: [serial number] author. Report title [R]. Number and place of publication: publisher and year of publication. Start and end page numbers.

7. Standard: [serial number] standard number, standard name. Date of promulgation.

8. Newspaper article: [serial number] author. Title. Name of newspaper, year-month-day (edition).

9. Electronic document: [serial number] Principal. Title of electronic document [identification and carrier type of electronic document]. Source or available address, date of publication or update/date of reference of the electronic document (optional).

10. Various undefined files: [serial number] Principal. Document title [Z]. Place of publication: publisher, year of publication.