In daily study, work or life, people often come into contact with composition, which is a narrative method to express a theme through words after people's ideological consideration and language organization. Still at a loss for composition? The following is a 600-word 10 debate composition prepared for you, which is for reference only and I hope it will help you.
Today is an important day. There will be a debate contest between Class 6 and Class 3 of Xintianyuan Primary School: Honesty vs White Lies.
As a debater, I have been ready for a long time, with information, a table and a chair to the "battlefield", the host announced the order to start, and the pros and cons began to "kill". First of all, there was a positive debate. For three minutes, he actually only talked for 30 seconds. After briefly stating my own views, I left the "pot" to our second debate, which put us both under great pressure!
The argument between the two sides made the following atmosphere very tense. The other side's argument shows that a white lie is for others, which is different from a malicious lie. The pros and cons of the argument immediately found loopholes and encouraged students, but students believed it. Since then, worse and worse examples show that white lies are harmful and should be directed at people. Not to be outdone, the other party used the car on the road to compare white lies with honesty, and once again expressed white lies, with a good starting point and without hindering honesty. Such a big loophole! Of course, I can't let go. I stood up at once and wanted to enter the free debate early in order to refute the opposing views. We say a lie is a lie, while the opposition says it is a white lie, and the starting point is good. After a short discussion, we entered the free debate session.
As a very important second debater in this team, Xiao Xu was the first speaker to express the loopholes I just discovered. Just now, the opponent argued that it doesn't matter that one road only accounts for half, but if there are too many lies, honesty will not pass. His words made the other person lost in thought and immediately changed the subject, but white lies were all to help others and did not hinder honesty. Hearing this, I can't sit still. I stood up and said, "We gave an example in the second debate just now. Is the teacher's starting point not good? " Isn't this a white lie? If it will harm people, why tell white lies? "So the other party made a fatal mistake." We don't think this is a white lie. Wouldn't it be better to encourage the old man with white lies on his deathbed? "We immediately grasped the definition of white lies and launched a storm.
After this argument, winning or losing is no longer important. In the debate, we know that whether it is a white lie or being honest with each other, we must analyze the specific situation, and we need to think about the problem from the other side's point of view and care about each other.
A debate composition 600 words 2 "The theme of this debate is whether it is beneficial to open books. The requirements of this debate competition are: hold your own views, respect each other and convince others by reasoning. Ok, now please ask the affirmative debater Jiang Yumeng to give a positive opinion. " Teacher Xi announced on the stage that a heated debate had begun.
Jiang Yumeng whoosh jumped up from his seat and looked down at the opposite side as if he had won the game. The momentum seemed to eat us all. What are you proud of? Not a winner yet! "Open book is beneficial" is what Song Taizu said. ........................................................................................................................................... Before ...................... could wait for Jiang Yumeng to sit down, the opposing debater Cao Yun immediately stood up and retorted, "Some unhealthy books will lead many teenagers to commit crimes after reading them ..." It seems that my worry is superfluous, and Cao Yun is right. "People who read bad books and embark on the road of crime are out of their minds ..." Qu Zilin, Fang, gushed. I am absent-minded, I mumble, that is not necessarily everyone is absent-minded! Ha! I found her loophole, so I should give them a good fight during the free debate.
Then there is more intense free debate time. The pros and cons confronted each other, the classroom was full of gunpowder, and war was imminent. "We think it is beneficial to open books ..." As soon as the discussant sat down, Cao Yun immediately retorted. "There are many unhealthy books on the market. Is this beneficial? " Everyone is very angry. If you don't let me, I won't let you. You argued word for word, and the war entered a white-hot stage. "Is it the knife's fault that a person cuts people with a knife in the street?" Tao's aggressive words made us a little overwhelmed, and we were about to be proud. Fortunately, Dong Yifan blocked a wave of "floods" ...
Finally, the teacher made a summary: "Both sides of the debate are well prepared and well founded. Our debate is wonderful! But the purpose of holding this debate is to tell you what kind of "paper" you should open Read books selectively in the future! "
Our opponents gained the upper hand, because they were well prepared and justified, and everyone cheered. The square is like a defeated rooster, depressed. This is really an unforgettable debate!
A debate composition is 600 words in three classes. Teacher Ye strode to the podium and mysteriously wrote "Is it beneficial to open the book?" The students were puzzled and looked at the teacher with puzzled eyes. I thought to myself: What is Teacher Ye going to do? The teacher seemed to see through our thoughts and said slowly, "Today we are going to have a debate, and the topic is …" Teacher Ye pointed to the blackboard, and the students read aloud in unison-is it beneficial to open the book?
We chose the pros and cons, and the game began. Chai Haoyang, an active debater, took the lead in speaking: "I think it is definitely good to open the book. The ancients said that books have their own golden houses, and it is of course beneficial to open them. " "Not necessarily, there are many pirated books, and there are many mistakes that lead us astray! What's more, the printing quality of these books is also very rough, and the vision of reading these books is extremely easy to decline. " The opposing students immediately retorted tit for tat.
You come and go on both sides of the defense, to outdo each other. There is a big mountain that cannot tolerate two tigers. With such a heated debate, of course, we prefer to sit still and watch the tigers fight. The wonderful debate continued, "books are for reading well, but also for joining practical activities and truly mastering knowledge." The other side gradually could not resist the offensive. Fortunately, Teacher Ye came to the rescue in time and saved a little face. "The ancients also said that it is better to believe in books than to have no books." Teacher Ye said.
Now it's time for the whole class to speak freely, and the scene has become a bit buzzing like a broken nest. Chai Haoyang began to burst into a small universe: "Books are about reading good books, reading more and reading well. As the saying goes, I am familiar with 300 Tang poems, and I can recite them without writing poems. " The opponents were silent. I can't wait to help them.
At this moment, Wang Yuwei, who is usually unknown, suddenly stood up: "Some people will learn to treat others with evil from the cruel descriptions in the book. Is this also conducive to opening books? " Wang Yuwei, a short man who usually can't fart for long, is really hidden. It seems that what Pan Changjiang said is concentrated essence, which is really good.
However, thanks to an eloquent Chai Haoyang, the active debaters quickly turned the tables and won the final victory of the debate. The first debate in our class ended with an avalanche of applause.
A debate composition of 600 words 4 This morning, our class held a fierce debate. The positive view holds that opening books is beneficial, while the negative view holds that opening books is not necessarily beneficial. I am the opponent's debater. A "angry words and swords" began.
First of all, the debate between the two sides expounded the views and reasons of all parties, and now it is about to start a debate or even a "quarrel" (haha, it seems to be a quarrel). He said that it is beneficial to open books and gave his own reasons. I'm not easy to mess with. I came prepared. I said angrily, "A good book is better than a treasure house, and a bad book is better than ten robbers." So is it beneficial to open books? What volume do we have to open! We still think it is beneficial to open books. "Three arguments immediately went on to say," I don't think it's right. People say that opening books is beneficial, but you are wrong. Isn't this anti-ancients? "The debate between the three of us turned into a pig liver color, and there was silence for a while. It took a long time to say, "What about the man's mentality?" Sanbian said dismissively in the front, "The murderer holds a knife. Is it bad to blame the knife? "It's time for a free debate. After Lu Chen said some useful reasons for opening this book, our Li Qi should stand up and refute it. I didn't expect her to speak for boys, which really made us dumbfounded. I saw someone talking to himself with his head down and someone laughing. I turned red with anger and thought, Ah! ! Disappointingly, Richie turned her elbow outward. That is, Founder Gan Chengdao said, "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools. "Ah! That's a wise statement. Chen Rui quickly argued: "Since a book is a medicine, it has two functions: First, it is a good medicine, and medicine can cure diseases; The second is poison, which will kill people, won't it? " Ma Yanze bit back: "You girls say that reading books is not necessarily beneficial, so why do you still study?" Wang Jue retorted, "We girls don't read books, but we don't read useless books! "After some excuses, the teacher announced that the boy won! As for me, I became the best debater!
Although we didn't win the debate, I still think it is very meaningful. Because I understand that the success or failure of the debate is not the key, but should focus on participation.
A debate composition has five classes of 600 words. Today, we finally look forward to the long-awaited debate. The pros and cons are divided into two rows of six people, north and south, around the podium. With the topic "Is it beneficial to open the book", only listen to the director's command. At this time, the phalanx players, like several soldiers on standby, are eager to try, as if they were ordered to go to the battlefield immediately. Look at that heroic opposition. They seem to have answers. It remains to be seen who will die.
The debate began, and the square took the lead with preemptive tactics, only to see a smile on the corners of its players' mouths. But the opponent's first bullet was not bad, and our team resisted the opponent's powerful offensive in the form of famous sayings.
Seeing the audience's eyes wide open, our little rabbit's heart pounded and thought, No way, the other party has a "good show". The positive side said, "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Unexpectedly, the opponent returned a bullet in the same way, and the bullets of both sides collided together, grinding out the spark of wisdom, which made me shine at the moment. I retorted that "medicine has three poisons, and books are no exception." Those who support and oppose all applaud, but the positive one still has nothing to hide, which makes me puzzled.
It's a bad thing that the professional players finally played the trump card. The morale of our army has dropped greatly, and the students who support both sides shouted, "Good! All right! Good! " People in the square even demoralized our army in a few words. Our team also gave them a blow, which was really beautiful. Zheng Fang was not so excited, but Zheng Fang still said: "Reading is like breaking thousands of volumes, and writing is like a god." We retort that "it is better to take the Wan Li road than to study in thousands of books". The opposing team members gradually changed from passive to active, and the students who supported each other cheered again. Some people even wrote the words "the other team will win" on cardboard.
After class, there is still no winner, but I understand a truth: in fact, the combination of positive and negative views is the perfect view, so I must read more books and read good books in the future.
A debate composition of 600 words 6 At eight or nine o'clock this morning, intense words came from Class 5 140. What happened? Ah! So that's what happened. Faced with the benefits of opening books, students make a lot of money. Suddenly, a loud voice interrupted the students' quarrel. Stop. Otherwise, let's have a debate!
The students said in unison: good. And they all recommend Tian Hongkun as the host. Tian Hongkun said that the debate has rules. First of all, representatives for and against it should be elected. In the debate, both sides should convince people by reasoning ... Before the host finished speaking, the two sides started a fierce exchange of words. "The star of erudition" Tan said: "Books are the eternal fruit of human civilization, and books are the ladder of human progress. This sentence is that the opposing side is speechless. Ha ha! The students who are in favor now are in high spirits. However, the other side's "Bai Xiaosheng" Li Ji 'an was not convinced. He said: "But now there are many unhealthy books in the bookstore, which may lead to juvenile delinquency." The positive' pistachio' immediately retorted:' You can study hard, gain new knowledge and improve your writing level.' After listening to the direct call, the students on the positive side said yes, while the students on the negative side said,' Children have poor analytical skills and weak resistance, so they may not be able to distinguish good books from bad books. The opposing students nodded frequently. Positive pistachio theory: you can learn selectively under guidance. Seeing that the situation was not good, Wang was a little nervous, so he came forward to help. The host had to announce that the answer king was out. In this case, the positive party has the advantage, while the opposing party has the courage to see the bad form, saying,' Some teenagers are addicted to reading extracurricular books, and reading them in the class with poor self-control will lead to a decline in their grades.' Founder's "Little Zhuge" said:' Extra-curricular books are books you read in class after school, and students across the street also read extra-curricular books!' This sentence makes the opposing students scratch their heads anxiously. When the opposing side tried to refute, the old man slipped away and the first debate in history ended.
I don't think both sides are completely right about whether it is beneficial to open books. We should read, but we should read properly and carefully. ........
Today, we held a small debate contest. That scene is really more intense than a large-scale debate!
The theme of this debate is "Have fun or study hard after class". I agree. We advocate "have fun after class". Before the debate began, my heart was pounding and I was afraid that I would be speechless in the debate.
The host of the debate is an old gentleman. The old teacher announced: "Now, the debate begins!" I'm debating. First of all, I want to say. I quickly stood up, eloquently said some disadvantages of after-school study and advantages of after-school play, and then quickly sat down. On the surface, it looks calm, but in fact, my heart has long been chaotic. Then, it's the opposing side arguing. The opponent stood up confidently and said, "We think we should study after class. Because the class has been going on for 40 minutes, it is necessary to consolidate the class and review it. " Then, there are two positive arguments, two negative arguments and so on. After the three arguments of the opposing side are finished, it is a free debate. The old teacher announced: "Now, the opposing side will speak first." However, no one on the other side stood up to speak, and all the other students laughed. The old man looked at it and announced, "Now, the positive side will speak first." As soon as the voice fell, I stood up and said, "It's been 40 minutes since class. Of course, we should play and relax after class. " Let the brain relax, otherwise, if the brain is tired, it will cause a series of symptoms. "The opposing party immediately retorted, but they stood up at the same time! That's funny! The free debate is over. The following is the most important final statement. Starting from the opposing side, the opposing side's four arguments stood up, and after only two sentences, they couldn't go on, so the opposing side's two arguments were added. Then it's our turn to argue. The pros and cons talk fluently and confidently about the benefits of playing for a long time after class.
Finally, the old man announced: "The debate won!" "Yes!" Everyone at our party is very happy. Later, I was named "the best debater". I'm really happy. The debate is over, but laughter still echoes in the classroom.
A debating composition is 600 words. This time we are debating "Is the performance of the top bowl boy wonderful or not?"
The competition began with a convenient sentence from Zheng: "The second paragraph of the article. The program was wonderful and the venue was packed. I know that the young people's performance is wonderful, as can be seen from the packed house. So our point of view is' Top Bowl Boy's performance is wonderful'. "
Wang, the opponent's teammate, stood up: "Please turn to the back of the third paragraph. At the moment of turning sharply, that pile of bowls suddenly fell off his head! This unexpected mistake shocked all the audience. You can feel that young people are not skilled enough. If they were skilled enough, this pile of big bowls wouldn't suddenly fall off. So our point of view is that the performance of the top bowl boy is not wonderful enough. "
Li: "I don't agree with Wang as an opponent. Please see paragraph 7. This is really a thrilling struggle! From' thrilling' and' hard work', I realized that teenagers work hard. As the saying goes,' one minute on stage and ten years off stage'. If you want to succeed, you must learn to persevere. So our point of view is' Top Bowl Boy's performance is wonderful'. "
Listening to their performance, I stood up boldly, unable to resist the strong excitement inside: "Our view is that the top bowl boy's performance is not wonderful enough." . In the fifth natural paragraph,' on the stage, the boy with the top bowl stood stupidly, sweating all over his face, a little at a loss.' From this sentence, I realized that the top bowl boy was at a loss because he lost confidence in himself. If the performer has lost confidence in his performance, what's the point of this performance? So our view is that the performance of the top bowl boy is not wonderful enough. "
……
Then the teacher announced the result of the competition-the opponent won. However, the reason for the other side's victory is that we are United, and the so-called "unity is strong"! Dear friends, come on!
A debate composition of 600 words 9 This afternoon, the teacher organized us to be divided into those in favor: open books are beneficial and those against: open books are not necessarily beneficial, and a debate was held. I choose the opposite side.
The bell rang for class. The teacher asked us to sit face to face with the opposition and the square. "Small eyes stare at small eyes." The classroom immediately filled with a thick murderous look. Everyone suddenly became nervous, and the teacher was no exception. It was a tit-for-tat game!
The bell rang again, and the teacher gave an order: "Go!" The king in the square was the first to raise his hand high. "You tell me!" The teacher's name is Wang "Hello everyone! I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. Because. . . . . . "I didn't hear anything he said later. I'm just thinking about how to say it! "Good-very good-that's it!" I muttered to myself. I want to talk about choosing books.
"So I choose to open the book!" Seeing this, the king also sat down. The teacher nodded and gave him a point. "Teacher, I want to refute him!" I raised my hand. I don't know if it's because I was moved by my own spirit, or I think it's time for the other party to talk. She told me to get up. "Come on!" Yu Hongjing next to me gave encouragement, and I stood up confidently. "Hello everyone! I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books, because we don't know which books are good and which are not-"Jia will refute me before I finish. ""teacher, I want to refute! " He said, "Go!" The teacher added a little to me as he spoke.
"The ancients said,' There is a golden house in the book'." As long as you read books, you can gain something. "He said, but I immediately refuted him. He was speechless. When Zhou Jintai saw it, he immediately stepped forward to help. I wanted to say more, but the teacher had already given them some. I sighed deeply and sat down. Alas! The foam that just flew out is in vain.
This war of words is getting more and more fierce. All the students in our team came to help me. But they are also very competitive, not to be outdone, they are better. At this time, the game is over. We lost because there were too many people. But as we all know, winning or losing is a common occurrence for military strategists. We all know that whether we win or lose, we are all friends!
In this way, today's debate ended in the applause we gave ourselves.
Debate 600-word composition 10 "Our view is ……" "Please answer the opposing debater directly." "So, have you heard such a story ..."
Eloquence echoed in the classroom, and everyone was discussing it tit for tat ... I forgot to mention that we were having a debate!
The theme of the debate is "Can primary school students get paid for housework?" . I am a supporter. I support primary school students to do housework and get paid.
"We think that primary school students can be paid for housework, because it can cultivate their ability to do housework and get used to it gradually."
"We believe that if children are paid for their work every day, they will become dependent on the remuneration. If you don't give money for a day, you will quit. " The first speaker of the other side was confident and proud.
"When children get used to doing housework, they won't give money to do it."
"no! Suddenly not giving money may also make parents lose their integrity in front of their children, just like the story of Ceng Zi killing pigs ... "Another female classmate stood up and excitedly told the story of Ceng Zi killing pigs.
Silence ...
Watching the teacher embellish from time to time on the stage, my heart has been beating drums and deer hit. But I have always been more angry and more calm! Thinking hard about countermeasures, I finally had an epiphany. The debater of our team spoke: "This possibility does exist, but children are always sensible. If they knew their parents' good intentions, they wouldn't care anymore. The reward of labor can let children know from an early age that there is nothing for nothing. I think I can pay. "
What? I cann't believe you stole my lines
Forget it, I can add something. "In addition, it can make children work hard and become interested in labor."
Suddenly, anyway, the debater put forward: "collecting housework remuneration will make children take money as the standard, thus becoming selfish and lacking in dedication." Alas! It's a magic height of one foot and a magic height of ten feet!
Continue the awkward silence. ...
This sudden debate is really wonderful. We even mentioned "social environment" and "family responsibility" ... so I won't go into details one by one.
It's hard to say who wins or loses. Looking at the wonderful arguments written by teachers on the whiteboard, each has its own merits. This was unimaginable when we were preparing for the debate an hour ago.
;