Write a 400-word debate composition (6 recommendations) 1 "Open book is beneficial!" "Opening a book may not be beneficial!" Whose voice echoes in my ears for a long time, oh! It turns out that there is a debate in Class One, Grade Five.
On Friday afternoon, our class meeting was used to hold a debate. At first, the host drew Li, who was active. She said kindly, "People often say' open books are good'. I think this idiom is very correct. Even now, society is cruel and challenging. How can you do without reading? " As soon as the voice fell, our opposing classmates disagreed with her, so everyone raised their hands. Wang invited Yang and said loudly, "I object to what Li said. If some students can't tell good books from bad books, they will muddle through. What a romantic novel! Martial arts movies! ..... I was fascinated, and I thought in class, and my grades plummeted! " At this time, the students in the square seemed to be blocked by towels and could not speak. At this time, Teacher Zhu said: "Hello, the classmates opposite!"
After listening to the teacher's words, our hearts were filled with joy, and we clapped our hands to celebrate. We are very proud. At this time, founder Zhang stood up and understood their great worries. She said impatiently, "I support' opening books is beneficial' and oppose' opening books is not necessarily beneficial'! Why is it useless to open books? Admittedly, it is beneficial to open books. How can your classmates know so much knowledge without reading books? " It is true that our Yang stood up and said, "Please respect us. We are not saying that reading is useless, but it may not be beneficial. Please make it clear! " When the bell rang, the teacher called to stop. The host said, "Today's debate is over. See you on Wednesday! "
The students in this "reading debate" are angry with each other, and no one will admit defeat. Well done! I also know from it that I will study in the future!
Write a debate composition in 400 words (6 recommended). Shakespeare said, "Books are the nourishment of the whole world." I don't object to this sentence, but if primary school students indulge in some unhealthy books such as comics and violence, they will easily embark on the road of crime. Some people think so, but others object, so our class has a heated debate.
In the warm applause of the students, the debate began. As soon as Chu Zhuo Ling, the representative of Zheng Fang, stood up, she said confidently, "Gorky said that books are the ladder of human progress. Therefore, we think it is beneficial to open the book. " Liu Chenxi did not show weakness, immediately stood up and said loudly: "We don't think reading is necessarily beneficial, knowledge does not have to be found in books, and knowledge cannot be separated from practice. It's better to read thousands of books than to take Wan Li Road. If we soak in books all day, won't we become bookworms? " The words of the opposing side won a burst of warm applause from the students.
Zheng Fang immediately retorted: "The ancients said,' There is Yan Ruyu in the book, and there is a golden house hidden in the book'. Only by reading constantly can we acquire new knowledge and make progress. It is those books that enable us to learn knowledge from them. If someone sees the road to crime, it can only show that this person has ulterior motives and has nothing to do with the book. " The other party was suddenly speechless.
After a little reflection, the representative of the opposing party countered: "Now many young people on TV have embarked on the road of crime because they read some bad books. The so-called evil thoughts are also accumulated because of reading too many bad books. Isn't this about books? " The debate is going on nervously. ...
Because the opponent's debate was more exciting, finally, the teacher announced: "the opponent has won the final victory of this debate!" " "As the opposing party, I can't tell you how happy I am. This debate has made us understand that there are good and bad books, so we should read more books that are beneficial to ourselves and helpful to our study.
I remember a 400-word debate composition (6 articles are recommended). 3 When it comes to debate, everyone will definitely think of the word "war of words". It is not difficult to think of such a scene: I saw several debaters like wolves, one by one eager to try.
At the beginning of the debate, you fought with each other to express your ideas. The whole battlefield is extremely fierce. Today, our class also held a special debate. The difference of this debate is that not only four debaters, but also 14 students participated in the war. What's going on here? Let's take a look together.
The theme of this debate is whether we should practice writing in the computer age. Our debate is that we should not practice writing in the computer age.
First of all, the teacher announced loudly: "From now on, the debate in Class 6, Grade 6 of 20xx will be made by the positive side." So the positive side argued, "I think Chinese characters should be practiced in the computer age, because Chinese characters are an excellent traditional culture in China, and we should not abandon them easily, and turning on more computers will also lead to myopia, so I think Chinese characters should be practiced in the computer age." At this moment, our second debater raised his hand and the teacher nodded. Our second debater stood up and said, "Just now you said you would be nearsighted in front of the computer, but it would be much better to wear some blue glasses." Suddenly, the pros chimed in: "Why do the opponents wear glasses?" The opponent argued and said with a smile, "I wear glasses because I have been studying at my desk." It is because of these books that my eyes are nearsighted, I have to practice writing at my desk, and I have to pay attention to sitting posture and holding a pen, which will hurt my hands. " The two sides argued: "Why do you write the homework assigned by the teacher every day?" Our second argument says, "Aren't all books printed now?" Then why are you watching it? "In the seventh debate, we said," Then don't use cell phones and computers. " Suddenly the other party shouted, "teacher, they are off topic, they are off topic." "At this time, a classmate said," It is more environmentally friendly to practice writing with paper. " We said, "We must cut down trees!" I then added: "Now social time is money, and practicing calligraphy is a waste of time. "
Finally, after a heated debate, I came to the conclusion that it is also necessary to practice calligraphy and computer typing is also possible. After this debate, I come to the conclusion that I should listen more, think more and think more. Really looking forward to the next debate!
I remember a debate composition of 400 words (6 recommended articles) 4 "Bell ..." The ringing bell rang, and a debate about whether it is beneficial to open books was launched in a tense and intense atmosphere.
First of all, Tan Hao, the host, spoke: "The debate in Class 52 about whether it is beneficial to open books is now officially started. First of all, the square can talk. " On the positive side, several students, including me, were with Gong Xing anyway. Our view is that "opening books is beneficial", while the other side thinks that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". When arguing, I feel like a rabbit. I said preemptively: "Books are the ladder of human progress, and books let us know the true feelings, hatred, joys and sorrows of the world."
Rival Gong Xing is not to be outdone. He said: "eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen, and taking medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects." I can only use this sentence to describe it. Opening books may not be beneficial. "
Our Deng Kaiwen quickly argued: "Opening books is beneficial, which is not only the source of knowledge, but also the lesson of the ancients, and it is also the method of self-cultivation." Our opponent Xu discovered our flaw and said, "You only said that opening books is beneficial, knowing that there are good books and even poisonous books. How can you read them indiscriminately? "
Our Peng Sijia quickly argued: "Reading more books can broaden your knowledge."
Opponent Deng Nina used this situation to force him: "Bad books, like bad friends, may' kill' you. Some people throw their homework aside because they are reading, and finally they will draw water with a sieve. "
So, we argue with each other.
Finally, the teacher summed up a sentence: "You must make choices when reading, take good care of books and put an end to bad books."
I benefited a lot from this debate. I will definitely read more books in the future, because a good book will make people understand a lot of truth, broaden their horizons and learn a lot of knowledge. In this way, I will take fewer detours in my future life and study.
Remember a 400-word debate composition (6 recommended) 5 I believe everyone knows what debate is! There was a debate in our class today.
First of all, our teacher explained one point that we need to debate: Do we need to practice writing when we have a computer? Zheng Fang believes that it is necessary to practice calligraphy; Your opponent thinks you don't need to practice writing on the computer.
Founder argued, "It is necessary to practice calligraphy. Although it is not as fast as a computer, it is not as good as a computer, but we still have to practice hard. Computers can type, but they can't replace our writing. The opponent argued: "Computer typing is fast and good, which is more convenient and simple than handwriting. With the development of human science and technology, people don't have to use the original writing method to write, otherwise what's the use of inventing science and technology? " The second positive argument says: "Although computers are faster and better than our writing, China Chinese characters have been circulating for a long time, and we should spread them, not let them die. Computers are only for entertainment, not for writing. The opponent argued confidently, "If computers are only used for entertainment, why do you use computers for work?" The third argument of the positive side said: "What we are talking about is to let Chinese characters be passed down forever. Computer work is needed by other leaders. We must do it, just like the homework assigned by the Chinese teacher. Can you not write? " Opponent Liu Bian said angrily, "Although homework really needs to be written with a pen, writing badly and not practicing calligraphy are two different things. Computer typing doesn't need to be written well at all. It consists of various instructions and can be written in many ways. " The four arguments in the positive side say: "People are born unable to write, but they are gradually trained. Now we stipulate that primary school students should write block letters correctly and skillfully with hard pen. Junior high school students should learn to write standard and writable words on the basis of skilled writing in block letters with hard pen, so as to improve the writing speed. "Zheng Sanbian suddenly stood up and said," Too much reliance on computer typing will only lead to poor literacy and improve the problem of forgetting words. Practicing Chinese characters can not only increase the amount of literacy, consolidate the memory of Chinese characters, but also cultivate one's temperament. "I don't know how long it took, the other party still can't say for sure, and finally won.
This is the debate competition, and it is also the first debate competition in our class. Have you ever held a debate in class? Share it with everyone.
I remember a 400-word debate composition (6 recommended articles). 6 The teacher assigned us a very interesting assignment-whether a white lie is conducive to honesty.
I am in a hurry to prepare the information, and the information is ready, just waiting for a wonderful debate. On Monday, the teacher asked us to prepare our own "results". We are all "fighting" to show our composition books-full of pages.
We started, and the teacher asked all of us who wanted to take part in the competition. At first, I was a little worried that the teacher wouldn't let us read until the teacher said, "Dictate if you can." I'm completely worried now. My group is Xu Bingnan, so I won't worry about it.
One of our opponents is Lu Mingjie, who is eloquent, rather than Tom Chang, who is inarticulate. We started reading. At first I blushed as much as a tomato. When the other party has a problem, I am speechless. They raised an unexpected question. I originally wanted to say: this is an unpredictable meteorological problem, but for parents, it is a good starting point for their children, but parents are only responsible for their children's lives. This question was robbed by Xu Bingnan before I could speak. He thought I was speechless, so he answered.
When he answered, I stole a look at him: his face turned red and was printed on his face like a birthmark. Of course, it is good for a timid girl like me to raise her hand. How can I not blush?
None of us want to give each other a chance to "breathe" and we all want to die. We really can't compete any more. If we compete again, the class will be over. This time, our teacher said, "The class will be over soon, so let's call it a day."
Why don't we forget to compare the time? Of course, we all want to. We are quietly waiting for the next opportunity. ...