Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Is education and training responsible for fraudulent sales?
Is education and training responsible for fraudulent sales?
Legal analysis: ordinary employees do not participate in fraud, do not have the purpose of illegal possession, and generally do not have to bear responsibility for not making profits. If it is determined that it constitutes a unit crime, and the directly responsible person in charge and other directly responsible personnel need to be sentenced to punishment, it shall be judged according to the specific circumstances.

Legal basis: Article 31 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that if a unit commits a crime, it shall be fined, and the directly responsible person in charge and other directly responsible personnel shall be punished. Where there are other provisions in the specific provisions of this Law and other laws, those provisions shall prevail.

Article 266 Whoever defrauds public or private property in a relatively large amount shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; If the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and shall also be fined; If the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated. Where there are other provisions in this Law, such provisions shall prevail.