Debate, according to its own nature and characteristics, can be divided into factual debate and rational debate (also known as rational debate).

Factual argument is a true description and generalization of objective things, which has a direct and realistic character, so it is the most convincing argument to prove the argument. The so-called "facts speak louder than words" is the truth. Factual arguments include specific cases, summarized facts, statistical data, personal experiences, etc.

Theoretical arguments refer to those viewpoints that come from practice and have been proved and tested by long-term practice and come to a correct conclusion. Including classic works and authoritative speeches (such as famous sayings and aphorisms). ), as well as the principles, laws and formulas of natural science.

You can write stories about Socrates, Confucius and idioms.

Extended data:

Argument is closely related to argument, and it is the relationship between proof and proof.

This parameter has the following requirements:

(1) Pay attention to the typicality of the argument.

Factual arguments include various examples, historical facts and statistical data, and only typical and representative arguments can be convincing. Don't generalize, you can't see one thing. Choose only the trivial things around you as arguments. For example, when discussing the view that "everyone close to Mexico is black", it is often unreliable, unconvincing and controversial to use the example that "my neighbor is in prison".

(2) Pay attention to the accuracy of the argument

Facts and arguments must be convincing, and their materials must be accurate and true. It is forbidden to make things up. Many students write their compositions from memory, because the materials are inaccurate and they are too lazy to research them. As a result, the electric light invented by Edison was put on Einstein, and the medal that Madame Curie showed to the children who were indifferent to fame and fortune was called a gold watch.

(3) Pay attention to the pertinence of the argument

Some materials are rich in connotation and should be carefully considered when using. At the same time, even the same event has many reasons. If we don't grasp the subtle differences of many factors, we will play the "edge ball", resulting in the disconnection between arguments and arguments. Therefore, the theme of material selection must be consistent with the argument in order to prove the argument.

(4) Pay attention to the novelty of the argument

Many students' argumentative writing can't be separated from some old examples, such as the relationship between failure and success, which seems to be inseparable from the light bulb invented by Edison, and Zhang Haidi's writing is indispensable for success in adversity. These old examples of "fathers using their sons and teachers using their students" have certainly lost their freshness and attraction.

References:

Baidu encyclopedia-arguments